Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Pen | Foolscap Pads |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chair | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 2 | Table | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Room | 1 Room per Candidate |
| 4 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Foolscap Pads | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 6 | Client (Foster Care Provider and Child) | 2 Persons per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Introduction and Engagement | |||
| Introduced self to the foster care provider and child (Award 1 mark for correct response) | 1 | ||
| Stated the objectives of the assessment clearly (Award 1 mark for correct response) | 1 | ||
| Explained roles during the session to participants (Award 1 mark for correct response) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 3 | ||
| TASK 2: Assessment of Child Rights Enforcement Issues | |||
| Used structured tools to interview foster care provider regarding child safety (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Observed child's emotional state and behavior during interaction (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Engaged respectfully and professionally with foster care provider and child (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Assured confidentiality of information to clients (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Portrayed active listening skills throughout the session (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| TASK 3: Identification of Policy Gaps and Violations | |||
| Engaged and reviewed the existing child rights policy documents (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Assessed gaps or violations of child rights based on observations and interviews (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Identified specific child rights violations such as neglect or exploitation (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 6 | ||
| TASK 4: Implementation of Corrective Plans | |||
| Recommended immediate corrective actions such as awareness or referrals (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Suggested mid-term actions like community workshops and education (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Outlined long-term strategies including strengthening protection mechanisms (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 6 | ||
| TASK 5: Documentation and Reporting | |||
| Documented all observations, findings, and actions taken accurately (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Explained follow-up process and scheduling with foster care provider (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Filed and shared reports with relevant stakeholders through printed form and email (Award 2 marks for correct response) | 2 | ||
| Concluded session on time and thanked participants (Award 1 mark for correct response) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Complete and clear documentation of child rights enforcement issues including identified gaps and corrective plans (Award up to 10 marks based on completeness, clarity, and accuracy) | 10 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 42 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Pen | Foolscap Paper |
| Notebook | Child Rights Policy Document |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Foolscap Paper | 2 Sheets per Candidate |
| 3 | Chair | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Table | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Child Rights Policy Document | 1 Copy per Candidate |
| 6 | Notebook | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Identification and Analysis of Child Rights Issues | |||
| Reviewed the Child Rights Policy document thoroughly (Award 2 marks for correct and thorough review) | 2 | ||
| Identified specific child rights violations based on policy gaps and community issues (Award 1 mark for each correctly identified violation, max 3) | 3 | ||
| Engaged stakeholders or hypothetical scenarios to gather relevant information (Award 1 mark for evidence of engagement or contextual understanding) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 6 | ||
| TASK 2: Development of Corrective Action Plan | |||
| Formulated immediate corrective actions targeting urgent issues (Award 2 marks for clear and relevant immediate actions) | 2 | ||
| Outlined mid-term corrective measures with clear objectives (Award 2 marks for well-defined mid-term actions) | 2 | ||
| Proposed long-term strategies for sustainable child rights enforcement (Award 2 marks for comprehensive long-term plans) | 2 | ||
| Allocated roles and responsibilities to relevant stakeholders (Award 2 marks for relevant and clear role assignments) | 2 | ||
| Specified timelines and resources required for each corrective action (Award 2 marks for realistic timelines and resource planning) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| TASK 3: Documentation and Reporting | |||
| Prepared a clear, organized corrective action plan document (Award 2 marks for clarity, organization, and completeness) | 2 | ||
| Included follow-up and monitoring mechanisms in the plan (Award 2 marks for detailed follow-up procedures) | 2 | ||
| Demonstrated proper filing and reporting protocol for stakeholders (Award 2 marks for correct reporting and filing methods) | 2 | ||
| Concluded the session professionally by summarizing and thanking (Award 1 mark for proper conclusion) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Corrective action plan document is complete, logically structured, and meets the specified page limit (Award 5 marks for a complete and well-structured document) | 5 | ||
| Plan addresses all identified child rights issues with appropriate corrective actions (Award 5 marks for relevance and adequacy of corrective actions) | 5 | ||
| Roles, timelines, and resources are clearly specified and realistic (Award 5 marks for clarity and feasibility) | 5 | ||
| Follow-up and monitoring mechanisms are clearly defined and practical (Award 5 marks for detailed and practical follow-up plan) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 43 | ||