By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you create reliable and professional drawings that are essential for safe and effective civil engineering projects.
Retaining walls are essential civil engineering structures widely used in infrastructure projects across Kenya to prevent soil erosion, manage land slopes, and support elevated ground. For Quantity Survey professionals, understanding the different types of retaining walls is crucial for accurate cost estimation, material takeoff, and project planning. This chapter focuses on identifying various retaining wall types, their structural characteristics, and typical applications within the Kenyan construction context.
Retaining walls vary in design and function depending on site conditions, soil type, and load requirements. Quantity Surveyors must distinguish these types to anticipate construction complexities and resource needs. This knowledge supports effective budgeting and contractual management for projects such as county government roadworks, commercial developments, and public infrastructure.
Gravity retaining walls resist lateral earth pressure primarily through their own weight, making them suitable for moderate height walls in stable soil conditions.
Cantilever walls use a vertical stem and a base slab to leverage soil weight and geometry for stability, requiring less material than gravity walls.
Counterfort walls are similar to cantilever walls but include triangular webs called counterforts that tie the stem to the base slab, enhancing stability.
Anchored walls employ additional support by anchoring cables or rods into the soil behind the wall, increasing resistance to lateral loads.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter covered the various types of retaining walls, highlighting their specific functions and structural differences. It explained the importance of preparing accurate retaining wall drawings, emphasizing the steps involved in producing clear and detailed plans that comply with relevant standards. The chapter also detailed the essential components of retaining wall drawings, including elevation views, cross-sections, and foundation details. Attention was given to the conventions used in technical drawings such as line types, scales, and annotations to ensure clarity and consistency. In addition, the chapter explored the detailed aspects of retaining walls, focusing on reinforcement placement, drainage provisions, and material specifications. The need for precise dimensioning and proper labeling to facilitate construction was underscored throughout. Overall, the chapter provided comprehensive guidance on producing professional retaining wall drawings that meet engineering and safety requirements.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring Tape (5m) | Retaining Wall Models (Gravity, Cantilever, Counterfort, Sheet Pile) |
| Spirit Level (24 inch) | |
| Notebook and Pen |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Safety Helmet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Safety Boots | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 3 | Reflective Safety Jacket | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Measuring Tape (5m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Spirit Level (24 inch) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Notebook and Pen | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 7 | Retaining Wall Models (Gravity, Cantilever, Counterfort, Sheet Pile) | 1 Set per Group of 4 Candidates |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF RETAINING WALL TYPES | |||
| Wore appropriate PPE (Helmet, Safety Boots, Reflective Jacket) (Award 1 mark for each PPE correctly worn) | 3 | ||
| Assembled necessary tools and materials for inspection (Award 0.5 marks for each correctly assembled item, up to 2 marks) | 2 | ||
| Inspected the Gravity retaining wall model and correctly identified its type (Award 3 marks for correct identification and classification) | 3 | ||
| Inspected the Cantilever retaining wall model and correctly identified its type (Award 3 marks for correct identification and classification) | 3 | ||
| Inspected the Counterfort retaining wall model and correctly identified its type (Award 3 marks for correct identification and classification) | 3 | ||
| Inspected the Sheet Pile retaining wall model and correctly identified its type (Award 3 marks for correct identification and classification) | 3 | ||
| Recorded observations accurately in the notebook (Award 3 marks for complete and accurate notes) | 3 | ||
| Cleaned and stored tools and materials properly after inspection (Award 2 marks for correct cleaning and storage) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 22 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Correct classification of all four retaining wall types (Award 2 marks for each correctly classified retaining wall type) | 8 | ||
| Sub-Total | 8 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 30 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring Tape (5m) | Nails 2 inches |
| Spirit Level | Lime / Cement |
| Hammer | Reinforcement Bars (R6) |
| Shovel | Binding Wire |
| Builder's Square | Sand |
| Plumb Bob | Ballast |
| Cutting Tool / Pliers | Timber Boards 25mm thick |
| Bending Tool | Water |
| Trowel and Float Set | |
| Wheel Barrow | |
| Compaction Rod |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measuring Tape (5m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Spirit Level | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Hammer | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 4 | Shovel | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 5 | Builder's Square | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 6 | Plumb Bob | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Cutting Tool / Pliers | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Bending Tool | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Trowel and Float Set | 1 Set per 4 Candidates |
| 10 | Wheel Barrow | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 11 | Compaction Rod | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 12 | Nails 2 inches | Sufficient |
| 13 | Lime / Cement | Sufficient |
| 14 | Reinforcement Bars (R6) | 1 Full length Pc per Candidate |
| 15 | Binding Wire | 1 Kg per Candidate |
| 16 | Sand | Sufficient |
| 17 | Ballast | Sufficient |
| 18 | Timber Boards 25mm thick | 8 m length Pc per Candidate |
| 19 | Water | Sufficient |
| 20 | Pens | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: SETTING OUT THE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL LAYOUT | |||
| Identified and used appropriate PPE including helmet, safety boots, and reflective jacket (Award 1 mark for each correctly used PPE) | 3 | ||
| Prepared the site by clearing and marking a sufficient area for the layout (Award 2 marks for proper site clearance and preparation) | 2 | ||
| Assembled all required tools and materials before starting the layout (Award 0.5 mark for each of at least six correctly assembled tools/materials) | 3 | ||
| Set out the layout dimensions accurately with pegs positioned at correct locations as per drawing (Award 2 marks for each correctly positioned peg for four main corners) | 8 | ||
| Transferred dimensions to profile boards and fixed builder’s line correctly (Award 1.5 marks for each correctly transferred corner dimension and line) | 6 | ||
| Marked the layout on the ground accurately using lime (Award 1 mark for each correctly marked corner up to four) | 4 | ||
| Cleaned the work area after setting out (Award 1 mark for proper cleaning) | 1 | ||
| Cleaned and stored tools and equipment correctly after use (Award 1 mark each for cleaning and proper storing) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 29 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Layout length is within ±50mm tolerance of 5000mm (Award 3 marks for layout length within tolerance) | 3 | ||
| Layout thickness marked accurately at 600mm ±50mm (Award 3 marks for thickness within tolerance) | 3 | ||
| Layout height marked correctly as 1200mm ±50mm (Award 3 marks for correct height marking) | 3 | ||
| Layout is parallel to the datum line as per drawing (Award 3 marks for parallelism) | 3 | ||
| Layout is squared with correct diagonals (within ±20mm tolerance) (Award 4 marks for correct squareness) | 4 | ||
| Profile boards are positioned correctly according to layout plan (Award 4 marks for correct placement of profile boards) | 4 | ||
| Complete set out of layout as per procedure with all pegs, lines, and markings (Award 2 marks for 50% completion, 3 marks for 50-75%, 5 marks for above 75%) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 25 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 54 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.