Records management is a cornerstone of effective Library and Information Management, ensuring that information resources are organized, preserved, and accessible for decision-making and service delivery. In Kenyan libraries and information centres, maintaining a robust record keeping system supports accountability, compliance with legal requirements, and efficient retrieval of information. This chapter explores the critical processes of assessing records and selecting appropriate record keeping systems tailored to the unique needs of library environments.
Record assessment is a fundamental activity in managing library records, involving the systematic evaluation of records to determine their value, usability, and retention requirements. This process guides librarians and information managers in deciding which records to preserve, archive, or dispose of, thereby optimizing storage space and ensuring compliance with institutional policies and national regulations such as Kenya’s Access to Information Act. Effective record assessment enhances service delivery by making relevant information readily available to users.
Records assessment employs various methods to evaluate records systematically, ensuring that decisions about their retention and disposal are well-informed. These methods are vital for libraries where diverse materials, from acquisition records to user registration forms, require evaluation.
Appraisal involves determining the value of records based on their administrative, legal, fiscal, and historical importance. For example, a university library may appraise acquisition records to decide which documents are essential for audit purposes and which can be discarded after a certain period.
Sampling entails reviewing a representative subset of records to infer the condition and relevance of the entire collection. In a county library system, sampling circulation records might reveal patterns in user behaviour and help decide which records to retain for statistical analysis.
Surveys and questionnaires collect input from staff and users on the usefulness and frequency of record usage. For instance, librarians at a national museum library might use questionnaires to determine which cataloguing records are frequently accessed and should be prioritized for preservation.
Physical inspection assesses the condition and organization of records to identify deterioration or obsolescence. A school library may conduct physical inspections to detect damaged or outdated student registration files that require repair or disposal.
This method examines how often records are accessed or referenced, guiding retention decisions based on user demand. A banking institution’s library may analyse loan request logs to determine which financial manuals are still relevant to staff and should be preserved.
Record assessment serves multiple purposes in library settings, directly influencing the effectiveness of information management practices.
Assessment helps libraries adhere to statutory retention periods and institutional guidelines, avoiding legal penalties. For example, county government libraries must comply with national archival standards when managing public records.
By identifying records that no longer hold value, libraries can free up physical and digital storage, reducing costs. A large university library may dispose of obsolete periodicals to create space for new acquisitions.
Retaining only relevant and active records ensures that users can access current and useful information promptly. A hospital library benefits from retaining up-to-date medical guidelines while discarding outdated protocols.
Assessment identifies records of enduring value that document institutional history, contributing to cultural heritage. National archives in Kenya preserve key documents from educational institutions that reflect the country’s development.
Knowing which records are vital enables libraries to prioritize their protection and recovery in case of disasters. For example, a cooperative society library might secure membership records critical for business continuity.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter explored the process of maintaining an effective record keeping system, beginning with record assessment methods such as records appraisal, content analysis, and gathering user feedback through surveys. The purpose of these assessments is to ensure records remain relevant, accurate, and useful for organizational needs. Selecting an appropriate record keeping system involves considering criteria like cost, the nature of records handled, security requirements, integration with other systems, and compliance with legal standards. Various types of record keeping systems were examined, including electronic document management systems, content management systems, and enterprise resource planning systems, each with distinct functionalities suited to different organizational contexts. The chapter also emphasized the importance of security and risk management to protect records from threats and ensure their integrity. Categories of hazards that can compromise record security were identified, alongside effective methods to safeguard records, ensuring they remain confidential, accessible, and reliable over time.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Pens | Sample records file |
| Highlighter pens | Record assessment checklist form |
| Marker pen | Manila folders |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workstation | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Sample records file (mixed types: correspondence, reports, invoices) | 1 File per Candidate |
| 3 | Record assessment checklist form | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Pens | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Highlighter pens | 1 Pc per 2 Candidates |
| 6 | Manila folders | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 7 | Marker pen | 1 Pc per 3 Candidates |
| 8 | Dust coat | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 9 | Gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare for Record Assessment | |||
| Wore dust coat and gloves before handling records (Award 2 marks for proper PPE use) | 2 | ||
| Assembled all sample records and assessment forms (Award 1 mark for assembling required materials) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 3 | ||
| TASK 2: Conduct Record Assessment Using Various Methods | |||
| Applied appraisal method to categorize records by value (Award 3 marks for correct appraisal application) | 3 | ||
| Used retention scheduling to determine record retention periods (Award 3 marks for correct retention scheduling) | 3 | ||
| Performed condition assessment for physical state of records (Award 2 marks for condition inspection) | 2 | ||
| Made notes on relevancy and usability of records (Award 2 marks for detailed relevancy notes) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| TASK 3: Prepare and Organize Assessment Report | |||
| Compiled assessment findings into a 3-page report (Award 4 marks for completeness of report) | 4 | ||
| Organized report with appropriate headings and clarity (Award 3 marks for report organization) | 3 | ||
| Labeled manila folders clearly with assessment results (Award 2 marks for clear labeling) | 2 | ||
| Used marker pen for folder titles (Award 1 mark for proper folder identification) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| TASK 4: Finalize and Clean Up | |||
| Checked report and folders for neatness and completeness (Award 2 marks for quality check) | 2 | ||
| Stored all assessment materials properly in workstation (Award 1 mark for proper storage) | 1 | ||
| Cleared the working area and disposed waste appropriately (Award 2 marks for cleaning work area) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 5 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Assessment report is 3 pages long, clear, and comprehensive (Award 5 marks for report quality and length) | 5 | ||
| Records are correctly categorized by value and retention period (Award 5 marks for correct categorization) | 5 | ||
| Folders are clearly labeled and organized (Award 3 marks for folder labeling and organization) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 13 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 41 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Ruler | Sample office records (mixed files) |
| Marker pen | Records appraisal checklist form |
| Content analysis template form | |
| Manila folders | |
| Box for storage |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workstation | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Records appraisal checklist form | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Sample office records (mixed files) | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 4 | Manila folders | 5 Pcs per Candidate |
| 5 | Marker pen | 1 Pc per 3 Candidates |
| 6 | Ruler | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Dust coat | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 8 | Gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 9 | Content analysis template form | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 10 | Box for storage | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Records Appraisal | |||
| Wore dust coat and gloves before handling records (Award 2 marks for wearing PPE) | 2 | ||
| Assembled all records to be appraised (Award 1 mark for assembling records) | 1 | ||
| Reviewed records for appraisal criteria: completeness, relevance, and condition (Award 1 mark each for assessing completeness, relevance, condition) | 3 | ||
| Marked appraisal checklist accurately with appropriate retention recommendations (Award 4 marks for correct appraisal markings) | 4 | ||
| Separated records into categories based on appraisal (retain, archive, dispose) (Award 2 marks for correct categorization) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 12 | ||
| TASK 2: Content Analysis | |||
| Used content analysis template to extract key information from records (Award 3 marks for extracting key content) | 3 | ||
| Categorized information by subject, date, and relevance (Award 3 marks for correct categorization) | 3 | ||
| Summarized findings on content analysis template clearly and concisely (Award 3 marks for clear summarization) | 3 | ||
| Filed analyzed records into correct manila folders (Award 2 marks for correct filing) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 11 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Completed appraisal checklist with accurate marks and recommendations (Award 5 marks for accuracy and completeness) | 5 | ||
| Content analysis template fully and correctly completed (Award 5 marks for completeness and clarity) | 5 | ||
| Records correctly categorized and filed in manila folders (Award 5 marks for correct categorization and filing) | 5 | ||
| Final storage box labelled with correct title and date (Award 3 marks for proper labelling) | 3 | ||
| Workstation cleared and records stored properly (Award 3 marks for neatness and storage) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 21 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 44 | ||