By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
- Identify different types of information materials that require restoration.
- Follow the correct procedures to assess materials needing restoration.
- Recognize signs that indicate when restoration is necessary.
- Apply proper steps to prepare information materials for restoration.
Mastering these skills helps you preserve valuable information materials, ensuring they remain accessible and useful for years to come.
Information materials preservation is a critical function within Library and Information Management in Kenya, ensuring that valuable documents, books, archival records, and multimedia resources remain accessible and intact for current and future users. Restoration plays a vital role when materials have suffered damage from environmental factors, mishandling, or natural deterioration. This chapter focuses on the identification of information materials suitable for restoration, the various conservation methods applicable in Kenyan libraries, and the guiding principles that underpin ethical and effective restoration practices. Understanding these aspects equips information professionals to extend the lifespan of collections, supporting knowledge retention across institutions such as county libraries, university archives, and national repositories.
Identifying which information materials require restoration is the first step in any restoration programme. It involves examining the condition of materials, judging their value to the institution and weighing what restoration would cost, so that limited skills, materials and money go to the items that need them most. In Kenyan libraries and archives, where heat, humidity, dust and pests speed up decay, a clear set of criteria prevents valuable items from being lost while less important ones absorb the budget.
Example: the library of Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology surveys its special collection each year and lists the water-stained and torn volumes that go to its bindery for repair.
The identification of information materials for restoration involves assessing several factors that determine the urgency and appropriateness of intervention. The curriculum names three: how badly the item is damaged, what format it is in, and what restoring it would cost. Together they decide whether an item is restored, copied, replaced or withdrawn.
The physical integrity of an item is the most direct criterion for restoration. Librarians examine items for tears, brittleness, water stains, mould, insect damage, loose or broken bindings and fading ink, and record how much of the item is affected. The extent of damage decides the type of treatment and its urgency.
Partial damage affects part of an item while the rest remains sound: a torn page, a detached cover, a broken spine, a water stain on a few leaves or a small area of insect holes. Partially damaged items are usually repaired in-house with mending tissue, inlays or rebinding, and are a high priority because a small repair now prevents total loss later. Example: a dictionary at a school library with a few loose pages is re-sewn and returned to the shelf within a day.
Full damage affects the whole item: pages that crumble when turned, a volume soaked in a flood, mould through the whole text block or a film that has stuck together. Fully damaged items need specialist conservation, which may be beyond the library's own skills, or they are copied (photocopied, scanned or microfilmed) and the original is stored or withdrawn. The decision depends on the item's value: a unique record is conserved, a common textbook is replaced.
The format of an item decides which restoration methods are possible and who can carry them out, because paper, film, magnetic and digital media decay in different ways.
Print materials include books, journals, newspapers, maps, manuscripts and archival files on paper. Their damage comes from acidity, light, humidity, pests and handling, and they are restored by cleaning, mending, inlaying, de-acidification and rebinding. Most library restoration work is on print materials, and the skills and tools for it are available locally.
Non print materials include photographs, microfilm, audio and video tapes, CDs and DVDs, and digital files. They need different treatments: photographs and film need controlled cold storage and careful cleaning, tapes need re-winding and transfer to new carriers, and digital files need migration to current formats and storage. Restoration of non print materials often means copying the content to a new medium before the original fails.
Restoration consumes staff time, materials, equipment and sometimes the fees of an outside conservator, so the cost is weighed against the value of the item and against other options. Librarians compare the cost of restoring with the cost of buying a replacement copy, making a surrogate copy or withdrawing the item. Unique, rare and heavily used items justify higher costs; common items in print are usually replaced. A library with a limited budget, such as a SACCO resource centre, may restore only its key financial and legal records and replace everything else.
Materials that are frequently used or have high cultural, historical or research value are prioritised. Rare books, government reports and unique manuscripts are identified for restoration to keep them available to scholars and policymakers.
Items at risk of rapid deterioration because of environmental exposure or poor storage are earmarked for early restoration. Reports damaged by humidity in a county office, for example, need intervention before the information becomes unreadable.
Some materials have legal restrictions or cultural sensitivities that affect restoration decisions. Sacred or community manuscripts may require consultation with their custodians before any physical alteration.
Conservation methods for information materials vary depending on the type, extent of damage, and institutional capabilities. These methods aim to stabilise materials, prevent further degradation, and prepare them for restoration or continued use.
This method involves controlling environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, light exposure and pests to slow deterioration. At Kenyatta University Library, maintaining relative humidity between 40 and 60% and temperature around 20°C has been effective in preventing mould growth on paper collections.
Mechanical conservation covers physical repairs such as mending tears and reinforcing bindings. County libraries often use Japanese tissue paper to repair torn pages without compromising the original material.
Chemical treatments include de-acidification and the use of consolidants to strengthen fragile materials. Some archival materials at the National Museums of Kenya undergo chemical stabilisation to neutralise acidic paper that would otherwise crumble.
Digitisation serves as a complementary conservation method by creating electronic copies that reduce handling of fragile originals. The Kenya Medical Research Institute, for instance, digitises historical medical journals to preserve their content while limiting wear on the physical copies.
Proper storage such as acid-free folders, climate-controlled rooms and protective enclosures is essential. Business archives in Nairobi often use sealed cabinets with silica gel packs to manage moisture levels in stored documents.
Restoration must adhere to ethical and practical principles that ensure interventions respect the original material and maintain its integrity while being sustainable and reversible where possible.
Restoration techniques should allow future conservators to undo interventions without damaging the original material. This principle is crucial in university archives, where better restoration methods may become available in future.
Maintaining the authenticity of the material is paramount. Restoration should not alter the original content, format or appearance beyond what is necessary for stabilisation. In preserving historical maps at the National Library of Kenya, restorers avoid adding new markings or colours.
Restoration work should be visible on close inspection so that it can be told apart from the original. This transparency prevents confusion over what is original and what has been restored, supporting the integrity of research at institutions like the Kenya Literature Bureau.
Restoration methods should be cost-effective and within the institution's budget without compromising quality. County libraries often adopt affordable yet effective solutions such as locally available materials for repairs.
Materials and techniques used for restoration must be chemically and physically compatible with the original information materials to avoid adverse reactions. Adhesives used in restoration, for example, must not speed up paper degradation or cause discolouration over time.
Explain five criteria used to identify information materials that require restoration in Kenyan libraries. (10 marks)
Discuss the main methods of conservation applicable to information materials and their relevance in Kenyan library settings. (15 marks)
Outline the principles of restoration of information materials and explain why each is important. (15 marks)
Describe how the principle of reversibility influences restoration decisions in national archives. (10 marks)
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter focused on the process of restoring information materials by first identifying those in need of restoration based on criteria such as the extent of damage, format type, and cost implications. It highlighted the importance of assessing whether damage was partial or full and distinguishing between print and non-print formats. Various conservation methods were discussed as essential strategies to preserve these materials effectively. The principles guiding restoration were examined, emphasizing reversibility, originality, visibility, affordability, and compatibility to ensure that restoration efforts maintain the integrity and usability of the materials. The chapter then explored specific restoration techniques that can be applied depending on the type and condition of the information materials. Finally, it detailed several repair methods including full pasting, inlaying, fumigation, deacidification, tissue repair, and the use of equipment such as binders, laminators, photocopiers, scanners, microfilm, and printers to support the restoration process. The comprehensive coverage provided a clear framework for managing damaged information materials to prolong their lifespan and accessibility.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Ruler (30 cm) | Sample damaged print materials |
| Pen | Sample damaged non-print materials |
| Notebook | Classification schedules |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dust coat | 1 pair per Candidate |
| 2 | Face mask | 1 pair per Candidate |
| 3 | Gloves | 1 pair per Candidate |
| 4 | Reference list of information materials | 1 per Candidate |
| 5 | Sample damaged print materials (books, newspapers, pamphlets) | 5 items per Candidate |
| 6 | Sample damaged non-print materials (CDs, DVDs, microfilm) | 3 items per Candidate |
| 7 | Classification schedules for print and non-print materials | 1 per Candidate |
| 8 | Notebook | 1 per Candidate |
| 9 | Pen | 1 per Candidate |
| 10 | Ruler (30 cm) | 1 per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Identification and Classification | |||
| Wore PPE: dust coat, face mask, gloves (Award 1 mark for each PPE worn correctly) | 3 | ||
| Inspected each information material physically for damage and format (Award 0.5 mark per correctly inspected item, total 8 items) | 4 | ||
| Accurately identified format type (print or non-print) of each item (Award 1 mark per correct format identification of 8 items) | 8 | ||
| Classified each item according to restoration criteria (damage type, priority) (Award 1 mark per correct classification of 8 items) | 8 | ||
| Recorded identification and classification details neatly in classification table (Award 1 mark for neatness, 1 mark for completeness, 2 marks for accuracy) | 4 | ||
| Used ruler correctly to draw classification table of 30 cm by 21 cm (Award 3 marks for correct table dimensions and neatness) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 30 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Completed classification table with correct identification and classification of all 8 materials (Award 1.5 marks per correctly recorded item) | 15 | ||
| Classification table dimensions correct (30 cm by 21 cm) (Award 3 marks for exact dimensions) | 3 | ||
| Overall presentation neat and legible (Award 2 marks for good handwriting and layout) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 50 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Ruler (30 cm) | Damaged books (exercise books, 32 pages) |
| Ballpoint pen | Damaged newspapers (folded sheets) |
| Clipboard | Assessment checklist form |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dust coat | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Face mask | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 4 | Damaged books (exercise books, 32 pages) | 5 Pcs per Candidate |
| 5 | Damaged newspapers (folded sheets) | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 6 | Assessment checklist form | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Ballpoint pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Clipboard | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Ruler (30 cm) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Preparation and PPE use | |||
| Wore dust coat (Award 1 mark for wearing dust coat) | 1 | ||
| Wore face mask (Award 1 mark for wearing face mask) | 1 | ||
| Wore gloves (Award 1 mark for wearing gloves) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 3 | ||
| TASK 2: Assemble materials and tools | |||
| Collected all damaged books and newspapers (Award 1 mark for assembling damaged materials) | 1 | ||
| Prepared assessment checklist form, pen, ruler, and clipboard (Award 1 mark for assembling assessment tools) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| TASK 3: Assess extent of damage on materials | |||
| Examined each damaged book for physical damage (tears, wetness, brittleness) (Award 2 marks for thorough examination of each book) | 2 | ||
| Examined each damaged newspaper for physical damage (tears, fading, brittleness) (Award 2 marks for thorough examination of each newspaper) | 2 | ||
| Categorized damage extent accurately as Partial or Full for each item (Award 3 marks for correct categorization of damage extent) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| TASK 4: Document findings | |||
| Recorded details of each item assessed on checklist form (Award 2 marks for accurate recording of item details) | 2 | ||
| Documented the restoration procedure recommended (Award 1 mark for recommended procedure documentation) | 1 | ||
| Included date of assessment and assessor's name (Award 1 mark for complete documentation information) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 4 | ||
| TASK 5: Clean up and storage | |||
| Returned damaged materials to designated area (Award 1 mark for proper storage of materials) | 1 | ||
| Cleared and cleaned working area (Award 1 mark for clearing the working area) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Completed damage assessment checklist form with all required details and correct categorizations (Award 6 marks for completeness and accuracy of documentation) | 6 | ||
| Sub-Total | 6 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 24 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.