By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you confidently understand building plans and communicate effectively on site, making you a valuable asset in the construction industry.
Interpretation of working drawings is a fundamental skill for Quantity Surveyors in Kenya, as it underpins accurate measurement, costing, and project management. Working drawings provide the detailed visual representation of construction projects, essential for understanding the scope and specifics of building works. Mastery of drawing titles and their identification enables surveyors to navigate complex documentation efficiently, ensuring precise quantity take-offs and effective communication with stakeholders.
The ability to identify a drawing correctly from its title is crucial in Quantity Surveying, as it directs the professional to the specific information required for measurement and costing. Drawing titles follow standardized conventions that reflect the nature and purpose of the drawings, facilitating quick recognition and reducing errors on site and in the office. In Kenyan construction projects, familiarity with these titles improves collaboration among architects, engineers, contractors, and quantity surveyors.
Drawing titles are structured to convey clear and concise information about the drawing’s content and purpose. Understanding this structure helps Quantity Surveyors locate relevant drawings without confusion.
Recognizing common drawing titles is necessary for Quantity Surveyors to extract relevant data quickly and avoid misinterpretation that could lead to cost overruns.
Drawing titles in Kenya adhere to international and local standards to maintain consistency and clarity across projects.
Quantity Surveyors must apply systematic methods to identify and verify drawings, reducing errors and improving workflow efficiency.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter focused on interpreting working drawings by first guiding students to identify drawings accurately through their titles. It emphasized the importance of reading and scaling drawing dimensions correctly according to the specified units of measure to ensure precise measurements. Students learned to recognize the shapes represented in drawings by analyzing their geometric forms, which aids in understanding the design intent. The chapter also covered how to read and correlate schedules alongside the drawings, enabling the extraction of detailed information such as quantities and material specifications. Together, these skills enable effective comprehension and use of technical drawings in building works measurement. Mastery of these topics ensures that students can confidently interpret drawings for practical construction applications.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring Tape (5m) | Set of working drawing sheets |
| Pen | |
| Notebook | |
| Highlighter Marker | |
| Ruler (30cm) |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Set of working drawing sheets | 1 set per Candidate |
| 2 | Measuring Tape (5m) | 1 per Candidate |
| 3 | Pen | 1 per Candidate |
| 4 | Notebook | 1 per Candidate |
| 5 | Highlighter Marker | 1 per Candidate |
| 6 | Ruler (30cm) | 1 per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: IDENTIFICATION OF DRAWING TYPES | |||
| Used appropriate PPE (helmet, safety boots) before handling drawings (Award 1 mark each for helmet and safety boots) | 2 | ||
| Assembled all tools and materials before starting the task (Award 1 mark for assembling all required items) | 1 | ||
| Reviewed each drawing sheet systematically (Award 1 mark for reviewing systematically, 1 mark for thoroughness) | 2 | ||
| Correctly identified the title of each drawing sheet (Award 2 marks for each correctly identified drawing title, up to 5 titles) | 10 | ||
| Recorded identified drawing types accurately in the notebook (Award 1 mark for neatness, 1 mark for accuracy, 1 mark for completeness) | 3 | ||
| Highlighted drawing titles clearly using the marker (Award 1 mark each for clarity and neatness) | 2 | ||
| Returned drawings and tools to proper storage after task (Award 2 marks for proper storage and care) | 2 | ||
| Maintained good workstation organization and cleanliness (Award 2 marks for clean and organized workspace) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 24 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| All drawing titles identified match the provided drawing sheets (minimum 5 types) (Award 2 marks for each correct drawing type identified, zero if incorrect) | 10 | ||
| Written list of drawing types is clear, legible and complete (Award 3 marks for clarity and legibility, 3 marks for completeness) | 6 | ||
| Drawings returned undamaged and properly arranged (Award 4 marks for undamaged and organized drawings) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 44 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Architectural scale ruler (metric) | Working drawing print (A3 size) |
| Measuring tape (5m) | Notebook or sketch pad |
| Pencils (HB) | |
| Eraser | |
| Calculator |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Architectural scale ruler (metric) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Measuring tape (5m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Pencils (HB) | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 4 | Eraser | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Notebook or sketch pad | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Calculator | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Working drawing print (A3 size) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Scaling and recording linear dimensions | |||
| Identified and used appropriate PPE (e.g. helmet, safety boots, reflective vest) (Award 1 mark each for correctly worn PPE) | 3 | ||
| Assembled all required tools and materials before starting (Award 1/2 mark each for assembling all 4 tools/materials) | 2 | ||
| Correctly identified scale of the drawing (1:50) (Award full marks for correct scale identification) | 3 | ||
| Used architectural scale ruler correctly to measure linear dimensions (Award 1 mark for each correctly scaled dimension, total 5 dimensions) | 5 | ||
| Recorded scaled dimensions accurately in metric units (mm) (Award 1 mark for each dimension correctly recorded) | 5 | ||
| Cross-checked at least two dimensions for accuracy (Award 1 mark for each dimension correctly cross-checked) | 2 | ||
| Maintained neatness and clarity in recording measurements (Award 2 marks for neat and legible records) | 2 | ||
| Cleaned and stored tools correctly after use (Award 1 mark each for cleaning and proper storing) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 24 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Scaled length dimension matches drawing within +10 mm tolerance (6000 mm) (Award 4 marks for correct length dimension within tolerance) | 4 | ||
| Scaled width dimension matches drawing within +10 mm tolerance (4000 mm) (Award 4 marks for correct width dimension within tolerance) | 4 | ||
| Other three linear dimensions scaled and recorded correctly within +10 mm tolerance (Award 2 marks each for three other correct dimensions) | 6 | ||
| Final recorded dimensions are complete and consistent with the working drawing scale (Award full marks for completeness and consistency) | 6 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 44 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.