By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills ensures you can support building structures safely and effectively, keeping everyone on site protected and the project running smoothly.
Building shores are essential temporary structures that provide support to walls, slabs, and other building elements during construction, ensuring safety and stability. In the role of a quantity surveyor in Kenya, understanding the foundation types for shores is critical for accurate cost estimation, planning, and risk management. Foundations for shores must be selected and designed to suit the soil conditions, load characteristics, and site constraints to prevent settlement or failure. This chapter begins with a comprehensive examination of the various types of foundations used for building shores, focusing on their application, advantages, and considerations in the Kenyan construction environment.
Foundations serve as the interface between the building shores and the ground, distributing loads safely to prevent structural failure or excessive settlement. In Kenya, variable soil conditions ranging from expansive clays in Nairobi to rocky terrains in Rift Valley require careful foundation selection for shores. Quantity surveyors must understand these foundation types to prepare accurate bills of quantities and advise on cost-effective and safe temporary works solutions. The following subtopics explore the primary foundation types used for building shores, their characteristics, and practical relevance.
Shallow foundations are those constructed near the ground surface, typically within a depth equal to or less than their width. They are widely used for shores supporting light to moderate loads in firm soil conditions commonly found in urban areas like Mombasa and Kisumu. The choice of shallow foundation depends on soil bearing capacity, water table level, and the load from the building shore system.
In practice, a quantity surveyor working on a hotel renovation in Nakuru would specify pad footings under shores where the soil profile is firm, balancing cost and structural safety.
Deep foundations transfer loads from building shores to deeper, more stable soil strata or rock layers when surface soils are weak or compressible. These foundations are critical in areas with poor topsoil or where heavy loads are imposed, such as multi-storey building sites in Nairobi’s CBD.
Modern construction projects in Kenya increasingly adopt proprietary foundation systems designed for temporary works, offering adjustability and ease of installation. These systems enhance efficiency and safety, particularly in urban settings with limited space.
Quantity surveyors must evaluate these systems’ upfront costs against time savings and safety benefits when preparing project estimates.
Selecting the appropriate foundation type for building shores depends on multiple factors that must be weighed carefully by quantity surveyors during project planning and cost estimation.
Explain the main differences between shallow and deep foundations used for building shores in Kenyan construction sites. (10 marks)
Describe five factors that a quantity surveyor should consider when selecting a foundation type for building shores. (10 marks)
Discuss the advantages of using proprietary foundation systems for shores in urban construction projects. (10 marks)
Calculate the load capacity required for a pad footing supporting a building shore with a total load of 15 kN, given the soil bearing capacity is 150 kN/m². (10 marks)
Formula: Area = Load / Soil Bearing Capacity
Substitution: Area = 15 kN / 150 kN/m²
Calculation: Area = 0.1 m²
Result: The pad footing should have a minimum area of 0.1 m² to safely support the load.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter covered the essential aspects of erecting and dismantling building shores, starting with the various types of foundations that provide the base support for temporary works. It then explored the different types of shores assignments, highlighting their specific roles in supporting structures during construction. The chapter detailed common shoring materials used in the industry, emphasizing their properties and suitability for different tasks. Methods for connecting shores were examined to ensure stability and safety during use. Legal requirements were addressed through construction laws that govern safe practices in temporary works. Local authority guidelines were discussed to align shoring activities with regulatory standards. Practical procedures for shoring construction and erection were outlined, focusing on correct installation techniques. Finally, the chapter explained the safe dismantling of shores to prevent accidents and maintain site safety.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring Tape (5m) | Nails 2" (50 mm) |
| Spirit Level | Lime/Cement |
| Builder's Square | Reinforcement Bars (R6) |
| Plumb Bob | Binding Wire |
| Hammer | Sand |
| Shovel | Ballast |
| Cutting Tool / Pliers | Timber Boards 25 mm thick |
| Trowel and Float Set | Water |
| Wheelbarrow | |
| Compaction Rod |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measuring Tape (5m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Spirit Level | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Builder's Square | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Plumb Bob | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Hammer | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 6 | Shovel | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 7 | Cutting Tool / Pliers | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Trowel and Float Set | 1 Set per 4 Candidates |
| 9 | Wheelbarrow | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 10 | Compaction Rod | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 11 | Nails 2" (50 mm) | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 12 | Lime/Cement | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 13 | Reinforcement Bars (R6) | 1 Full length piece per Candidate |
| 14 | Binding Wire | 1 kg per Candidate |
| 15 | Sand | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 16 | Ballast | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 17 | Timber Boards 25 mm thick | 8 m length per Candidate |
| 18 | Water | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 19 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: PROCESS OBSERVATION | |||
| Used appropriate PPEs including helmet, safety boots, and reflective jacket (Award 1 mark for each correct PPE used) | 3 | ||
| Assembled required tools and materials correctly for foundation selection (Award 1 mark for each correctly assembled tool/material up to 3) | 3 | ||
| Prepared and cleared site area sufficiently for foundation layout (Award 2 marks for complete and accurate site preparation) | 2 | ||
| Set out foundation layout accurately using measuring tape and builder's square (Award 1 mark for each accurately set out side up to 4) | 4 | ||
| Used spirit level and plumb bob to check verticality and levelness of foundation base (Award 1 mark for each correct use of leveling tools) | 3 | ||
| Selected foundation type appropriately based on site soil and shore load requirements (Award up to 5 marks for correct selection with explanation) | 5 | ||
| Marked foundation positions clearly on ground using lime (Award 2 marks for clear and accurate marking) | 2 | ||
| Cleaned and stored tools and equipment properly after completing the task (Award 2 marks for proper cleaning and storage) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 24 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Foundation base dimensions approximately 500mm x 500mm with depth 300mm ±50mm tolerance (Award 4 marks for dimension accuracy within tolerance) | 4 | ||
| Foundation layout is square with correct diagonal measurements (Award 3 marks for correct squareness and diagonal accuracy) | 3 | ||
| Foundation base level and plumb within ±10 mm tolerance (Award 3 marks for correct level and plumb) | 3 | ||
| Selected foundation type matches shore load and soil conditions as per site requirements (Award 5 marks for appropriate foundation type selection matching site conditions) | 5 | ||
| Overall neatness and clarity of foundation marking and preparation (Award 3 marks for neat and careful work) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 18 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 42 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring Tape (5m) | Timber Boards 50mm x 100mm x 3m |
| Spirit Level (600mm) | Timber Posts 75mm x 75mm x 3m |
| Hammer | Nails 3" (75mm) |
| Hand Saw | Binding Wire 1.5mm |
| Pliers |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measuring Tape (5m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Spirit Level (600mm) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Hammer | 1 Pc per 4 Candidates |
| 4 | Hand Saw | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Pliers | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Nails 3" (75mm) | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 7 | Timber Boards 50mm x 100mm x 3m | 4 Pcs per Candidate |
| 8 | Timber Posts 75mm x 75mm x 3m | 4 Pcs per Candidate |
| 9 | Binding Wire 1.5mm | 2 kg per Candidate |
| 10 | Safety Helmet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 11 | Safety Boots | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 12 | Reflective Safety Vest | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: MATERIAL SELECTION AND PREPARATION | |||
| Used appropriate PPE including helmet, boots, and reflective vest (Award 1 mark for each PPE worn correctly) | 3 | ||
| Assembled all required tools and materials before starting (Award 0.5 marks for each of 4 tools/materials assembled) | 2 | ||
| Inspected timber boards and posts for defects such as knots, splits, and warping (Award 1 mark for each defect checked properly, total 4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Measured and marked timber boards and posts accurately to specified lengths (3m) (Award 1 mark for measuring, 1 mark for marking, 1 mark for accuracy within ±10mm) | 3 | ||
| Cut timber boards and posts cleanly and to correct lengths (Award 3 marks for clean, correct cuts with minimal wastage) | 3 | ||
| Prepared timber edges by smoothing rough surfaces and removing splinters (Award 2 marks for neat and safe prepared surfaces) | 2 | ||
| Nailed timber components loosely for trial assembly (Award 2 marks for correct nailing technique and placement) | 2 | ||
| Tied binding wire securely where applicable (Award 2 marks for proper tying technique ensuring stability) | 2 | ||
| Cleaned and stored unused materials and tools properly after preparation (Award 2 marks for neat and safe storage) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 23 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Timber boards and posts prepared to correct lengths (3000mm ±10mm) (Award 3 marks for all components within tolerance) | 3 | ||
| Timber free from major defects affecting strength (knots, splits, warping) (Award 3 marks for defect-free selection) | 3 | ||
| Cut surfaces neat and smooth without splinters or rough edges (Award 3 marks for neat finish) | 3 | ||
| Trial assembly with nailed joints correctly aligned and loosely fixed (Award 3 marks for correct alignment and secure loose fixing) | 3 | ||
| Binding wire tied securely without slack or loose ends (Award 2 marks for secure wire ties) | 2 | ||
| Materials and tools cleaned and stored properly ensuring no damage (Award 2 marks for neat and proper storage) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 16 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 39 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.