By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you produce professional technical drawings that are essential for successful design and communication in the trade.
Applying Computer-Aided Design (CAD) in technical drawing is essential for Quantity Survey professionals in Kenya, enabling precise and efficient creation, modification, and analysis of drawings. CAD technology has transformed traditional manual drafting, allowing quantity surveyors to interact with detailed construction plans, improve measurement accuracy, and facilitate collaboration with architects and engineers. Mastery of CAD packages not only enhances productivity but also supports cost estimation, tendering, and contract management by providing clear, standardized drawings. This chapter explores CAD software identification, its use in drawing plane geometry, solid models, and orthographic pictorials relevant to quantity surveying practice.
In Kenya’s construction sector, quantity surveyors often work alongside architects and engineers who use various CAD software to produce technical drawings. Understanding the different CAD packages available enables quantity surveyors to select tools that best support their work, such as takeoff, measurement, and documentation. This knowledge also facilitates effective communication with design teams and ensures compatibility of files and standards across projects.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter introduced various CAD packages, highlighting AutoCAD as a primary example used in technical drawing. It explored the application of CAD software in creating precise drawings of plane geometry, enabling accurate representation of two-dimensional shapes. The chapter then progressed to the use of CAD in modeling solid objects, emphasizing three-dimensional visualization and detailing. Further, it covered the production of orthographic and pictorial drawings using CAD, demonstrating how these drawings aid in clear communication of design intent. Guidelines for the appropriate ratio of CAD manuals and space requirements for lecture and drawing rooms were also discussed to support effective learning and practice. Overall, the chapter provided comprehensive insights into integrating CAD technology within technical drawing processes to enhance accuracy and efficiency.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Computer with internet access | Project brief document |
| Pen and notebook | List of CAD software packages |
| Technical drawing samples |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer with internet access | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Project brief document | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | List of CAD software packages | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Technical drawing samples | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 5 | Pen and notebook | 1 Set per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Identification of CAD software packages | |||
| Identified at least five CAD software packages correctly (e.g. AutoCAD, SolidWorks, SketchUp, Revit, CATIA) (Award 1 mark for each correct identification, max 5 marks) | 5 | ||
| Described key features of each identified CAD package relevant to technical drawing (Award up to 1 mark for each accurate feature description, max 4 marks) | 4 | ||
| Compared suitability of CAD packages for different drawing tasks (Award 3 marks for clear and relevant comparison based on task requirements) | 3 | ||
| Selected the most appropriate CAD package for the mechanical part drawing (Award 3 marks for justified and appropriate selection) | 3 | ||
| Presented rationale for selection including software capabilities and project needs (Award 3 marks for clear, logical rationale) | 3 | ||
| Used PPE appropriately during computer use (e.g. anti-glare glasses, ergonomic seating) (Award 1 mark each for any two appropriate PPEs or ergonomic measures) | 2 | ||
| Organized workspace and tools efficiently (Award 2 marks for neat and safe workspace setup) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 22 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Correctly identified CAD packages with relevant features matching the project requirements (Award 1 mark for each correctly matched package, max 5 marks) | 5 | ||
| Appropriate software selected for the 1500mm x 1200mm mechanical part drawing (Award 5 marks for selection of suitable CAD software like AutoCAD or SolidWorks) | 5 | ||
| Logical and clear justification for software selection (Award 3 marks for coherent and relevant justification) | 3 | ||
| Report is well presented, clear and free of spelling errors (Award 3 marks for professional presentation and clarity) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 16 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 38 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Computer with CAD software installed | Pen and notebook for notes |
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Drawing template/reference sheet |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer with CAD software installed | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Mouse | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Keyboard | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Drawing template/reference sheet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Pen and notebook for notes | 1 Set per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: DRAWING PLANE GEOMETRY USING CAD | |||
| Used appropriate PPE (e.g., eye protection if applicable) (Award 2 marks for correct PPE use, otherwise 0) | 2 | ||
| Prepared CAD software environment (correct units, scale, and template) (Award 3 marks for correct setup of CAD environment) | 3 | ||
| Accurately drew a circle with diameter 100mm (Award 5 marks for correct diameter and smooth circle) | 5 | ||
| Accurately drew an equilateral triangle with 80mm sides (Award 5 marks for correct side lengths and angles) | 5 | ||
| Accurately drew a regular pentagon with 60mm sides (Award 5 marks for correct side lengths and angles) | 5 | ||
| Applied proper layer management and line types for different shapes (Award 2 marks for appropriate use of layers and line types) | 2 | ||
| Saved and printed the drawing as per instructions (Award 3 marks for correct saving and printing of the drawing) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 25 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Final drawing shows a circle of diameter 100mm within ±1mm tolerance (Award 5 marks for accurate circle dimension) | 5 | ||
| Final drawing shows an equilateral triangle with sides 80mm ±1mm and angles 60° ±1° (Award 5 marks for accurate triangle sides and angles) | 5 | ||
| Final drawing shows a regular pentagon with sides 60mm ±1mm and equal internal angles (Award 5 marks for accurate pentagon sides and angles) | 5 | ||
| Drawing is neat, correctly layered, and properly annotated (Award 5 marks for overall neatness and correct annotations) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 45 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.