By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering this skill will help you keep library collections organized and accessible, making a real difference in how people find the resources they need.
Library catalogues serve as essential tools in organizing, locating, and managing information resources within Kenyan libraries. This chapter explores the creation of library catalogues, focusing on the two primary forms used by information professionals: manual and electronic catalogues. Understanding these forms, their characteristics, and their applications is critical for effective library management and service delivery. The chapter situates these catalogue forms within the Kenyan library context, where both traditional and modern systems coexist to meet diverse user needs.
Library catalogues provide systematic access to a library’s collection, enabling users and staff to locate materials efficiently. In Kenya, libraries range from small community setups relying on manual catalogues to large academic institutions employing sophisticated computerized systems. Recognizing the forms of library catalogues and their operational contexts supports the effective management of library resources.
Manual catalogues represent the traditional method of organizing library holdings on physical media such as cards or printed lists. Despite the rise of digital technologies, many libraries in Kenya, particularly in rural or under-resourced areas, continue to rely on manual catalogues due to limited access to computers or stable internet connectivity.
A manual catalogue is a physical filing system where bibliographic information about library materials is recorded on cards or sheets arranged systematically, usually by author, title, or subject. Key characteristics include:
This system remains relevant in smaller libraries and archives where digital infrastructure is lacking.
A manual catalogue is a physical system used in libraries to record and organize bibliographic information about resources without the use of computers. In Kenyan libraries, this typically involves handwritten or typed cards stored in trays or cabinets, allowing users to search for materials by physically browsing through the cards. For example, the Kisumu County Public Library uses manual catalogues to help users locate books, especially where digital infrastructure is not available.
Manual catalogues offer several benefits, especially in resource-constrained environments:
Despite its benefits, the manual catalogue system has notable limitations:
These drawbacks have motivated many Kenyan institutions to transition towards electronic catalogues.
Manual catalogues are often implemented in libraries with limited funding or where staff lack ICT skills. The process involves:
Electronic catalogues represent the contemporary approach to library cataloguing, leveraging computer technology to provide dynamic, searchable access to library holdings. In Kenya, major university libraries, national libraries, and some public libraries have adopted computerized catalogues to improve service delivery and resource management.
An electronic catalogue is a digital database that stores bibliographic records accessible through computers or networked systems. Features include:
This form significantly enhances the efficiency and accessibility of library services.
An electronic catalogue is a computerized database that stores and organizes bibliographic records, enabling users to search for library materials using computers or online platforms. In Kenya, institutions such as the University of Nairobi Library use electronic catalogues to provide efficient and remote access to their collections, allowing users to search by various criteria such as author, title, or subject from any location with internet access.
Electronic catalogues offer numerous advantages that address the limitations of manual systems:
Despite its advantages, implementing electronic catalogues in Kenyan libraries can face challenges:
Libraries such as Moi University have invested significantly in ICT infrastructure to overcome these challenges.
The transition to an electronic catalogue involves several steps:
County government libraries in Nairobi have successfully implemented computerized catalogues through partnerships with ICT providers and donor agencies.
In Kenyan libraries, the choice of catalogue type directly affects how easily users locate materials relevant to their needs. Different catalogue forms serve distinct purposes, shaped by the nature of the collection and user requirements. Whether in university libraries like Moi University or county government archives, understanding the types of catalogues helps information professionals design effective access points that improve information retrieval efficiency.
The author catalogue organizes bibliographic entries based on the names of authors, editors, or corporate bodies responsible for the creation of the work. This type of catalogue is fundamental in libraries because users often search for materials by identifying the author. In Kenyan academic libraries, such as Egerton University Library, author catalogues facilitate locating theses, research papers, and books by specific scholars.
Author catalogues are typically arranged alphabetically by the author's last name, followed by the first name or initial. Entries include all works by a given author, allowing users to see the breadth of that author’s contributions. Corporate authors, such as government ministries or NGOs, are treated similarly, which is crucial for accessing official reports or policy documents.
Author catalogues provide direct access to an author's entire body of work, supporting research continuity. For instance, a student at Kenyatta University researching health policy can quickly find all publications by the Ministry of Health. This catalogue type supports accountability and citation verification in scholarly work.
One challenge is handling authors with similar names or name changes, common in Kenyan contexts due to cultural naming conventions. Libraries mitigate this by adopting authority control, standardizing author names to ensure consistent entries. Training library staff at institutions like Strathmore University in authority control techniques improves catalogue reliability.
Modern Kenyan libraries integrate author catalogues into online public access catalogues (OPACs), enhancing search capabilities with features like autocomplete and cross-references. This integration supports remote access for users in institutions such as the Kenya Medical Training College.
Subject catalogues classify materials according to topical content, enabling users to find resources relevant to a particular field or theme. This catalogue type is crucial in Kenyan libraries where users often seek all materials related to a subject like agriculture or public health.
Subject catalogues rely on classification schemes such as the Dewey Decimal Classification or Universal Decimal Classification, which organize topics hierarchically. Kenyan libraries, including the National Library Service, commonly use these systems to group materials under broad and narrow subject categories.
Subject catalogues support thematic browsing, allowing users to discover related materials they might not find through author or title searches. For example, agricultural extension officers at county offices can locate all resources under “Agricultural Practices” without knowing specific authors.
Effective subject catalogues depend on controlled vocabularies like the Library of Congress Subject Headings or locally adapted terms. Using standardized subject headings ensures consistent indexing, which is vital in Kenyan libraries serving multilingual communities. The Kenya National Archives, for instance, applies subject headings in both English and Kiswahili.
Subject cataloguing requires skilled cataloguers to accurately assign headings, a challenge in resource-limited settings. Continuous professional development programs at institutions like Moi University Library help address this by improving cataloguing accuracy and consistency.
The title catalogue organizes entries alphabetically by the title of the work, facilitating access when users know or remember the title but not the author. This catalogue is particularly useful in Kenyan public and school libraries where users often recall titles of popular books or manuals.
Entries in the title catalogue list the main title and may include subtitles or alternative titles. Articles and initial prepositions are generally disregarded in alphabetical order to improve search efficiency. For example, in a Nairobi County public library, a user searching for "The History of Kenya" would find it under "History."
Title catalogues accommodate users who recall specific works but cannot identify the author, common among students and general readers. This is particularly important in libraries like those of technical training institutes where manuals and textbooks are frequently accessed by title.
A limitation is the handling of anonymous works or those with similar titles. Kenyan libraries address this by cross-referencing titles with authors or subjects in integrated catalogues, enhancing retrieval accuracy. The Kenya Literature Bureau’s publications are often catalogued with such cross-references.
Title catalogues in OPACs allow keyword and phrase searches, improving user experience. Public university libraries have adopted title-based search filters to help students locate textbooks quickly.
The dictionary catalogue arranges entries alphabetically by the first significant word in any element of the bibliographic record, such as author, title, or subject. This comprehensive approach combines the benefits of author, title, and subject catalogues into a single alphabetical list.
Unlike separate author, title, or subject catalogues, the dictionary catalogue integrates all entries alphabetically, regardless of entry type. This allows users to search under any main word associated with a work, facilitating flexible and intuitive access.
Dictionary catalogues are advantageous in small to medium-sized libraries, such as county government office libraries, where the collection size allows manageable alphabetical listings. Users benefit from a one-stop access point without needing to know the specific catalogue type.
In larger institutions like the University of Nairobi, dictionary catalogues become unwieldy due to volume and complexity, leading to slower searches. These libraries prefer separate catalogues or digital OPACs with advanced search options.
Dictionary catalogues laid the foundation for modern OPACs that allow keyword searches across multiple fields simultaneously. This transition has improved access in Kenyan libraries by enabling users to search author, title, and subject in a single query.
The classified catalogue organizes entries according to a classification scheme, grouping materials by subject categories arranged in a systematic order. This catalogue enhances browsing and research by subject area, a method widely used in Kenyan academic and research libraries.
Entries in classified catalogues follow a classification number, such as Dewey Decimal, enabling users to browse related subjects physically or virtually. This arrangement supports thematic research, for example, at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) library.
Classified catalogues help users discover materials within a subject area, supporting interdisciplinary research and comprehensive study. For instance, a student researching environmental science at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology can browse all related topics grouped together.
Maintaining classified catalogues requires regular updates to classification schemes and reclassification of materials, a resource-intensive task. Kenyan libraries address this through periodic training and use of automated classification tools in digital catalogues.
Users unfamiliar with classification numbers may find browsing difficult. Kenyan libraries incorporate user education programs and signage to assist navigation in classified catalogue sections.
The divided catalogue splits the catalogue into separate parts, typically author, title, and subject catalogues, each arranged alphabetically. This traditional approach remains relevant in many Kenyan libraries with large and diverse collections.
Each part of the divided catalogue serves a specific access point: the author catalogue lists works alphabetically by author, the title catalogue by title, and the subject catalogue by subject headings. This separation allows specialized searching depending on user needs.
Divided catalogues are common in national and university libraries, such as the National Library of Kenya, providing clear pathways for users with different search strategies. This method supports diverse user groups, from researchers to casual readers.
The divided catalogue provides clarity and specialization but requires users to know which part to consult, potentially complicating the search process. Kenyan librarians mitigate this by offering user training and integrating cross-references among the parts.
Modern Kenyan libraries often combine divided catalogue principles with digital OPACs, allowing users to search across author, title, and subject fields simultaneously while retaining traditional catalogue structures for physical browsing.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter explored the process of creating a library catalogue by first identifying the two main forms: manual and electronic or computerized catalogues. It then examined the various types of catalogues commonly used, including author, subject, title, dictionary, classified, and divided catalogues, each serving different user needs. The chapter highlighted the essential information materials required for effective cataloguing and detailed the key tools involved such as classification schemes, cataloguing rules, authority files, lists of subject headings, and the Resource Description and Access standard. The steps for creating a manual library catalogue were outlined, focusing on measurements, cutting, perforation, and recording bibliographic details accurately. Finally, the chapter addressed the creation of electronic library catalogues, describing the procedural steps and the importance of establishing clear cataloguing policies to ensure consistency and accessibility in digital environments.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Pen | Library catalogue cards |
| Hole puncher | Manila paper sheets |
| Catalogue cabinet | Access to library computerized catalogue system |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Library catalogue cards | 20 Pcs per Candidate |
| 2 | Manila paper sheets | 5 Pcs per Candidate |
| 3 | Access to library computerized catalogue system | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Pen (blue or black ink) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Hole puncher | 1 Pc per 5 Candidates |
| 6 | Catalogue cabinet with rods | 1 Pc per 3 Candidates |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare Manual Catalogue Cards | |||
| Candidate dons dust coat before commencing work (Award 1 mark if dust coat is worn) | 1 | ||
| Candidate assembles tools and materials for manual cataloguing (Award 2 marks if all tools and materials are ready) | 2 | ||
| Candidate measures and cuts manila paper into 12.5cm by 7.5cm cards (Award 1 mark for correct measurement, 4 marks for cutting 4 cards accurately) | 5 | ||
| Candidate creates catalogue entries on cards with place of publication, publisher, year, subject, call number, and correct punctuation (Award 2 marks for each correct detail x4 cards) | 8 | ||
| Candidate punches a hole 1.3cm (half inch) above bottom of each card (Award 2 marks if hole is correctly positioned on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 18 | ||
| TASK 2: Organize Catalogue Cards in Cabinet | |||
| Candidate inserts thin iron rod through holes in catalogue cabinet (Award 2 marks if rod is inserted correctly) | 2 | ||
| Candidate arranges catalogue cards alphabetically by author (Award 3 marks if cards are in correct alphabetical order) | 3 | ||
| Candidate ensures cards are securely held and do not fall off rod (Award 2 marks if cards are stable and properly secured) | 2 | ||
| Candidate demonstrates identification of electronic/computerized catalogue form using provided system (Award 8 marks for correctly explaining features and differences between manual and electronic catalogue) | 8 | ||
| Sub-Total | 15 | ||
| TASK 3: Housekeeping and Tool Return | |||
| Candidate returns tools and unused materials to designated place (Award 1 mark if tools returned properly) | 1 | ||
| Candidate cleans workstation leaving it tidy (Award 1 mark if workstation is clean and orderly) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Catalogue cards cut to correct size 12.5cm x 7.5cm (Award 3 marks if all cards are correctly sized) | 3 | ||
| Catalogue cards contain accurate and complete bibliographic details with proper punctuation (Award 6 marks if all details on all cards are accurate) | 6 | ||
| Catalogue cards are punched and securely arranged alphabetically in cabinet (Award 5 marks if holes are properly punched and cards arranged securely and alphabetically) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 14 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 49 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Ruler 30cm | Manila paper sheets |
| Sharp scissors | Library catalogue cabinet |
| Pencil HB | Dust coat |
| Blue ballpoint pen | Cleaning cloth |
| Hole puncher | |
| Thin iron rod (30 cm length) |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manila paper sheets | 10 sheets per Candidate |
| 2 | Ruler 30cm | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Sharp scissors | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Pencil HB | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 5 | Blue ballpoint pen | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 6 | Hole puncher | 1 Pc per 3 Candidates |
| 7 | Thin iron rod (30 cm length) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Library catalogue cabinet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Dust coat | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 10 | Cleaning cloth | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare catalogue cards | |||
| Donned dust coat before starting work (Award 1 mark for wearing dust coat properly) | 1 | ||
| Assembled all tools and materials for card creation (Award 2 marks for gathering all required tools and materials) | 2 | ||
| Measured manila paper accurately using ruler for card size 12.5cm by 7.5cm (Award 2 marks each for length and width measurement accuracy) | 4 | ||
| Cut manila paper neatly into 8 cards of correct size (Award 5 marks for cutting neat straight edges and right dimensions) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 12 | ||
| TASK 2: Create author catalogue cards | |||
| Entered place of publication correctly on each card (Award 2 marks for correct detail on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Entered publisher name correctly on each card (Award 2 marks for correct detail on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Entered year of publication correctly on each card (Award 2 marks for correct detail on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Entered subject correctly on each card (Award 2 marks for correct detail on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Entered call number correctly on each card (Award 2 marks for correct detail on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Used correct punctuation and formatting on each card (Award 2 marks for correct punctuation and neatness on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 12 | ||
| TASK 3: Organize catalogue cards in cabinet | |||
| Punched hole half an inch above bottom edge on each card (Award 2 marks for correct hole position on all cards) | 2 | ||
| Inserted thin iron rod through holes in catalogue cabinet (Award 2 marks for smooth insertion and no damage) | 2 | ||
| Arranged catalogue cards alphabetically by author (Award 3 marks for correct alphabetical order) | 3 | ||
| Ensured cards are securely held in position on rod (Award 2 marks for secure and neat arrangement) | 2 | ||
| Returned all tools and materials to designated place (Award 1 mark for proper return of tools) | 1 | ||
| Cleaned workstation after task completion (Award 1 mark for neat and clean workstation) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 11 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Each catalogue card measures exactly 12.5cm by 7.5cm (Award 2 marks each for length and width accuracy) | 4 | ||
| All 8 catalogue cards contain complete bibliographic details (place, publisher, year, subject, call number) correctly written (Award 1.2 marks for each correct detail per card) | 6 | ||
| Cards are punched at correct position and arranged alphabetically by author (Award 3 marks for correct hole position and 3 marks for alphabetical order) | 6 | ||
| Cards are neat, legible, and held securely in catalogue cabinet (Award 4 marks for neatness, legibility, and secure holding) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 55 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.