By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
These skills will help you make a real difference in your community by supporting mental health and improving overall well-being.
Compiled by: Consolata Aoko
Before a community can watch its health, it must decide what to watch. Areas of interest are the health matters that a community health team chooses to follow over time because they affect many people, can be measured and can be acted upon. Five areas are central to community disease surveillance: nutrition, dietary assessment, surveillance itself, anthropometric assessment and water, sanitation and hygiene. Each gives information about the health of the community, and together they show where illness is likely to appear before it is reported at a health facility.
An area is chosen for a community by looking at the common illnesses and deaths recorded in the community unit, at what community members say worries them, at the data already held by the nearest health facility, and at what can be done with the people and resources available.
Nutrition is the process by which the body takes in and uses food to grow, stay active, repair itself and fight infection. Poor nutrition is both a cause and a result of disease: a poorly nourished child falls ill more often and recovers more slowly, and a child who is often ill loses weight and appetite. For this reason nutrition is one of the first areas a community health team watches.
Example: during a long dry season a community health team notices that more children in one village are thin and often sick. It records the cases, visits the families to learn what the children eat, and refers those who are severely malnourished to the facility.
Dietary assessment is the collection of information on what people eat and drink so that the adequacy and quality of the diet can be judged. It explains why a person or a community is malnourished and shows which groups need advice or support.
Steps for a 24-hour recall:
Surveillance is the continuous, systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of health data, followed by the timely sharing of the findings with those who need to act. Its purpose is to guide action, not only to describe a problem. Surveillance is therefore a cycle: data are collected, analysed, interpreted, shared and used, and the results of action are watched through the same system.
In Kenya, surveillance follows the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) approach, in which priority diseases are reported weekly and epidemic-prone diseases such as cholera are reported immediately. Later topics of this chapter describe how a surveillance system is planned and run.
Anthropometric assessment is the measurement of the size and proportions of the body to judge nutritional status and growth. It is quick, uses simple equipment and can be done in a home or at a community health session, so it is a practical tool of nutrition surveillance.
Accurate measurement needs scales to be checked regularly with a known weight, tapes that are not stretched or worn, and measurers who are trained to use the same method each time.
WASH stands for water, sanitation and hygiene. Safe water, safe disposal of human waste and good hygiene practices stop the faecal-oral spread of disease and are the base of community health. Because poor WASH is behind many diarrhoeal illnesses, its coverage and use are standard items in surveillance.
Example: a community health volunteer visiting households on one hillside records that most families fetch water from a single unprotected spring and that few have a handwashing station. The finding is reported, and the community is helped to protect the spring and set up simple handwashing stations.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountType: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Marker pens | Community map (A1 size) |
| Measuring tape | Notebook |
| Pen | Identification badge |
| Personal Protective Equipment (mask, gloves) |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Community map (A1 size) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Marker pens (red, blue, green, black) | 4 Pcs per Candidate |
| 3 | Measuring tape 30m | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Notebook | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Identification badge | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Personal Protective Equipment (mask, gloves) | 1 set per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare for community health interest area survey | |||
| Wore personal protective equipment (mask and gloves) correctly (Award 2 marks for correct PPE use) | 2 | ||
| Carried identification badge visibly (Award 1 mark for visible badge) | 1 | ||
| Assembled all required tools and materials before starting survey (Award 2 marks for complete preparation) | 2 | ||
| Checked and prepared community map for marking (Award 1 mark for map readiness) | 1 | ||
| Planned survey route using measuring tape and map landmarks (Award 2 marks for logical survey planning) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 8 | ||
| TASK 2: Conduct survey and identify key health interest areas | |||
| Physically surveyed the community area using measuring tape for distances (Award 3 marks for proper use of measuring tape in survey) | 3 | ||
| Identified at least five key health interest areas (e.g. water sources, health facilities, waste disposal sites, markets, schools) (Award 1 mark per correctly identified area, max 5 marks) | 5 | ||
| Recorded observations accurately in notebook (Award 3 marks for clear and complete notes) | 3 | ||
| Used marker pens to mark areas distinctly on the community map (Award 3 marks for clear map markings in correct colors) | 3 | ||
| Ensured spatial accuracy of markings relative to map scale and survey measurements (Award 3 marks for correct spatial representation) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 17 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Community map shows at least five health interest areas clearly marked with distinct colors (Award 5 marks for clear, distinct, and complete markings) | 5 | ||
| Map dimensions and scale conform to 841mm x 594mm (A1) size and survey scale accuracy within ±5% (Award 3 marks for correct map size and scale accuracy) | 3 | ||
| Markings correspond correctly to the surveyed locations and distances noted (Award 5 marks for accurate correlation between survey data and map markings) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 13 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 38 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Digital kitchen scale | 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire |
| Calculator | Food portion size estimation charts |
| Anthropometric measuring tape | Foolscap papers |
| Pen | |
| Reference nutrient intake tables for Kenyan diet | |
| Disposable gloves |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Food portion size estimation charts | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Digital kitchen scale (up to 5kg capacity) | 1 Pc per 2 Candidates |
| 4 | Foolscap papers | 5 Sheets per Candidate |
| 5 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Calculator | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Anthropometric measuring tape (150 cm) | 1 Pc per 3 Candidates |
| 8 | Reference nutrient intake tables for Kenyan diet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Disposable gloves | 2 Pairs per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare for dietary assessment | |||
| Wore disposable gloves before starting the assessment (Award 1 mark for correct glove use) | 1 | ||
| Explained the purpose of the dietary assessment to the household members (Award 1 mark for clear communication) | 1 | ||
| Assembled all tools and materials needed for data collection (Award 1 mark for completeness) | 1 | ||
| Checked the digital kitchen scale for accuracy and zeroed it (Award 1 mark for correct scale preparation) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 4 | ||
| TASK 2: Conduct 24-hour dietary recall interview | |||
| Asked each household member about all foods and drinks consumed in the last 24 hours (Award 2 marks for completeness and clarity) | 2 | ||
| Used portion size estimation charts to help respondents quantify food amounts (Award 2 marks for effective use of portion size charts) | 2 | ||
| Weighed or estimated portion sizes accurately using the digital scale (Award 3 marks for accuracy and method) | 3 | ||
| Recorded all dietary data legibly and systematically on foolscap paper (Award 2 marks for neatness and organization) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 9 | ||
| TASK 3: Analyze nutritional adequacy | |||
| Calculated total energy intake in kilocalories for the household (Award 3 marks for correct calculation) | 3 | ||
| Calculated total protein intake in grams for the household (Award 3 marks for correct calculation) | 3 | ||
| Compared intake values with recommended nutrient intakes for Kenyan population (Award 2 marks for correct reference and comparison) | 2 | ||
| Identified any nutritional deficiencies or excesses based on analysis (Award 2 marks for correct identification) | 2 | ||
| Summarized findings clearly and suggested appropriate dietary advice (Award 3 marks for clarity and relevance) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 13 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Complete and accurate 24-hour dietary recall record including portion sizes for all household members (Award 5 marks for completeness and accuracy) | 5 | ||
| Correct calculations of energy and protein intake matching recorded data (Award 5 marks for calculation accuracy) | 5 | ||
| Clear identification of nutritional adequacy status with reference to Kenyan standards (Award 4 marks for correct and clear interpretation) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 14 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 40 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.