Business Management  ·  Level 6
Principles Of Commercial Law
Chapter 5: Apply law of Agency
📚 5 Topics
⚑ What you will be able to do

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  • Classify different types of agents according to the law of agency.
  • Explain how an agent’s authority is properly established under the law of agency.
  • Identify the key duties that agents must follow based on the law of agency.
  • Recognize the rights that agents have according to the law of agency.
  • Determine the various methods for terminating an agency relationship in line with the law of agency.

Mastering these skills will help you confidently navigate and apply agency law in real commercial situations, making you a valuable asset in the business world.

Compiled by: Ann Chebet

The law of agency is a fundamental aspect of commercial law, governing the relationship where one party, the agent, acts on behalf of another, the principal, in business transactions. In Kenya’s dynamic business environment, understanding the classification of agents is crucial for business managers to navigate contracts, delegations, and liabilities effectively. This chapter focuses on the different types of agents within commercial law, providing clarity on their roles, authority, and implications in business dealings. Mastery of this topic supports sound decision-making in sectors such as banking, retail, and county government operations.

5.1 Classification of Agents

In commercial practice, agents vary widely in their scope of authority, mode of appointment, and the nature of the agency relationship. Kenyan businesses, from SACCOs to universities, rely on different agents depending on their operational needs and legal requirements. Classifying agents helps managers identify the rights and obligations inherent in each agency type, ensuring compliance and reducing risks in contractual engagements.

5.1.1 General Agents and Special Agents

General and special agents differ primarily in the extent of their authority and the duration of their agency relationship. Understanding this distinction is vital for business managers who delegate tasks or enter into agreements through representatives.

General Agents

General agents possess broad authority to act on behalf of the principal in all matters related to a particular business or employment. For instance, a branch manager of a retail chain in Nairobi acts as a general agent with authority to oversee daily operations, hire staff, and negotiate local contracts within the scope of the business. Their actions bind the principal legally in routine commercial dealings.

  • Continuous Authority: General agents usually have ongoing authority that extends over a series of transactions, such as a sales manager managing multiple deals.
  • Scope of Work: They handle tasks that are recurring and necessary for the business’s operation, including hiring employees or ordering stock.
  • Binding Effect: Contracts entered into by a general agent within their scope of authority are legally binding on the principal.
  • Employment Relationship: Often, general agents are employees or appointed representatives with a formal relationship with the principal.
  • Accountability: They owe fiduciary duties to act in the principal’s best interest, maintaining transparency and loyalty in their dealings.

Special Agents

Special agents have limited authority, typically confined to a single transaction or a specific task. For example, a SACCO appointing a legal practitioner to negotiate a property lease acts as a special agent for that specific purpose. Their authority ends once the task is completed.

  • Limited Authority: Their powers are narrowly defined and do not extend beyond the agreed task.
  • Temporary Engagement: Special agents are usually appointed for short-term or one-off assignments.
  • No Implied Authority: They cannot bind the principal beyond the specific instructions given.
  • Specific Accountability: They must strictly adhere to the principal’s instructions without deviation.
  • Common in Professional Services: Lawyers, auctioneers, or brokers often act as special agents in business transactions.

5.1.2 Mercantile Agents and Del Credere Agents

Mercantile and del credere agents play specialized roles in commercial transactions, especially in the buying and selling of goods. Their classification affects the nature of their liability and the extent of their responsibility towards the principal.

Mercantile Agents

Mercantile agents are authorized to buy, sell, or consign goods, often operating in commercial markets or warehouses. For example, a cooperative society might appoint an agent to sell agricultural produce on behalf of its members.

  • Authority Over Goods: They can negotiate sales and purchases of goods within the scope of their mandate.
  • Possession Requirement: Mercantile agents usually have possession of the goods or documents of title.
  • Binding Contracts: Their actions in selling or buying goods bind the principal.
  • Risk Management: They are responsible for handling goods with reasonable care during transactions.
  • Common in Trade: Agents in wholesale markets, export-import businesses, or commodity exchanges fit this category.

Del Credere Agents

Del credere agents not only act as mercantile agents but also guarantee payment by the buyer to the principal. This additional responsibility places them at higher risk and entitles them to extra commission.

  • Guarantee of Payment: They assure the principal that the buyer will pay, bearing liability if the buyer defaults.
  • Higher Commission: Due to the financial risk, del credere agents receive a premium commission.
  • Trust Relationship: They must carefully vet buyers to minimize payment risks.
  • Legal Obligations: Their guarantee creates a contractual obligation separate from merely acting as an agent.
  • Use in Credit Sales: Common in businesses where goods are sold on credit, such as machinery suppliers or vehicle dealers.

Del Credere Agents

Del credere agents are a special class of mercantile agents who, in addition to selling goods on behalf of the principal, guarantee to the principal that the third party will pay for the goods. This means that if the buyer defaults, the del credere agent is liable to the principal for the price. For example, a machinery dealer in Nairobi may appoint a del credere agent to sell equipment to farmers on credit, with the agent guaranteeing payment to the dealer.

  • Guarantee of Payment: The del credere agent undertakes to pay the principal if the buyer fails to do so, providing additional security for credit sales.
  • Entitlement to Extra Commission: Because of the increased risk, del credere agents are paid a higher commission, known as del credere commission.
  • Liability to Principal: If the buyer defaults, the agent must pay the principal, making the agent both a guarantor and a sales representative.
  • Common Practice in Credit Sales: This arrangement is often used in industries where goods are sold on credit, such as vehicle dealerships or agricultural equipment suppliers in Kenya.
  • Legal Standing: The relationship and liability of a del credere agent are recognized under Kenyan contract law, ensuring principals can recover losses from the agent if necessary.

5.1.3 Sub-Agents and Co-Agents

In complex business transactions, principal agents may delegate authority to sub-agents or work alongside co-agents. These relationships affect liability and delegation of duties within the agency framework.

Sub-Agents

Sub-agents are appointed by the original agent to perform part or all of the agency duties. For instance, a travel agency in Mombasa acting as a principal agent may appoint a local guide as a sub-agent to manage customer tours.

  • Delegated Authority: The original agent authorizes the sub-agent, who acts on behalf of both the agent and principal.
  • Liability: The principal is liable for the acts of the sub-agent if appointed with authority.
  • No Independent Contract: The sub-agent’s contract is with the agent, not directly with the principal.
  • Fiduciary Duties: Sub-agents owe duties to both the agent and principal.
  • Use in Complex Transactions: Common in logistics, travel industry, or multi-tiered sales operations.

Co-Agents

Co-agents are agents appointed by the principal to act jointly or severally in the same transaction. A bank may appoint multiple agents to sell shares in a public offering, each acting independently but towards the same goal.

  • Independent Authority: Each co-agent can act independently within the scope of their appointment.
  • Shared Responsibilities: They may share commissions or responsibilities as agreed by the principal.
  • Risk Distribution: Co-agents spread the workload and risk among themselves.
  • Coordination Required: Effective communication between co-agents is essential to avoid conflicts.
  • Common in Large Transactions: Used in large commercial projects or joint sales efforts.

Co-Agents

Co-agents are two or more agents appointed by the principal to act together or separately in the same transaction or series of transactions. Their roles and authority depend on the instructions given by the principal. For example, a Kenyan bank may appoint several co-agents to jointly manage the sale of shares during a public offering, each with defined responsibilities.

  • Joint or Several Authority: Co-agents may be required to act jointly (all must agree before acting) or severally (each can act independently within their authority), depending on the principal’s instructions.
  • Coordination of Actions: When acting jointly, co-agents must coordinate their decisions and actions to avoid conflicts and ensure the principal’s interests are protected.
  • Division of Duties: The principal may assign specific tasks to each co-agent, such as one handling negotiations and another managing documentation, as seen in large real estate transactions in Nairobi.
  • Shared Accountability: Co-agents are collectively responsible for the proper execution of their duties and may be jointly liable for losses caused by their actions.
  • Use in Large or Complex Transactions: Co-agency arrangements are common in large-scale projects, such as infrastructure development or syndicated loans, where multiple agents are needed to manage different aspects of the transaction.

Practice Questions

  1. Explain the key differences between a general agent and a special agent, providing examples relevant to Kenyan business contexts. (10 marks)
  2. Discuss the roles and responsibilities of a del credere agent in commercial transactions, highlighting why businesses might prefer this type of agent. (10 marks)
  3. Describe how sub-agents are appointed and the implications of their actions on the principal’s liability. Use examples from the hospitality or tourism sector. (10 marks)
  4. Compare and contrast mercantile agents and co-agents in terms of authority and business application. (10 marks)
The rest of this chapter
🔒

Create a free account to open more of this chapter.

Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.

Create a free account
🔒5.2 Establishment of agents' authority

In Kenyan business management, understanding how an agent’s authority is established is critical for ensuring that contracts and commitments made on behalf of a principal are legally binding. This knowledge protects businesses from unauthorized acts and clarif…

🔒5.3 Identification of Duties of Agents

In the Kenyan business environment, the relationship between principals and agents is fundamental to commercial transactions. Agents act on behalf of principals to perform tasks, negotiate contracts, or make decisions within the scope of their authority. Under…

🔒5.4 Identification of Rights of Agents

In Kenyan business environments, agency relationships are common, especially where business managers or representatives act on behalf of companies or principals. Understanding the rights of agents is crucial for business management professionals to ensure fair…

🔒5.5 Termination of Agency

In Kenya’s dynamic business environment, understanding how and when an agency relationship ends is vital for business managers to avoid legal disputes and ensure smooth commercial transactions. Agency termination affects contractual obligations, authority of a…

Chapter Summary

This chapter explored the various classifications of agents, highlighting the different roles and capacities in which an agent may operate within commercial transactions. It then examined how an agent's authority is established, focusing on the methods through which principals grant power to agents to act on their behalf. The discussion progressed to identifying the duties that agents owe to their principals, emphasizing responsibilities such as loyalty, obedience, and care. Alongside these obligations, the chapter clarified the rights agents hold, including entitlement to remuneration and protection against interference. Finally, the chapter addressed the ways in which an agency relationship can be terminated, considering factors such as mutual agreement, completion of the task, or revocation of authority. Together, these topics provide a comprehensive understanding of the law of agency and its application in commercial contexts.

Self-Assessment

🔒 PDFDownload this self-assessment, with answers

A. Written Assessment

  1. What are the main classifications of agents in commercial law? (3 marks)
  2. Differentiate between an agent’s actual authority and apparent authority. (3 marks)
🔒20 more in this section.

Chapter Examination Questions

🔒 PDFDownload these examination questions, with worked answers

SECTION A (40 Marks) - Answer ALL Questions

  1. Differentiate between a general agent and a special agent in the context of business management in Kenya. (4 marks)
  2. Explain how an agent’s authority can be established by implication in a commercial agency relationship. (4 marks)
🔒18 more in this section.
Flashcards 20 cards Study deck ▾
Question
1

↻ Tap card to reveal answer
🔒

18 more in this section.

Create a free account
Test Yourself 19 questions Start quiz ▾
0%
0 / 2
🔒

17 more in this section.

Create a free account
Am I competent?

At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:

  • Classify different types of agents according to the law of agency.
  • Explain how an agent’s authority is properly established under the law of agency.
  • Identify the key duties that agents must follow based on the law of agency.
  • Recognize the rights that agents have according to the law of agency.
  • Determine the various methods for terminating an agency relationship in line with the law of agency.

Tick each one you can genuinely do.

So, are you there yet?

You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.

Sign in to record how you're doing.