By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you manage project measurements and costs precisely, making your work reliable and valued in the trade.
Compiled by: John Ronoh
Abstracting is the stage of quantity surveying, under the traditional method of bill preparation, in which the squared dimensions from the taking-off sheets are collected together under their item descriptions, so that all quantities for the same item are gathered in one place, added up and, after deductions, reduced to a single net quantity. The abstract sheet is the working paper on which this is done: it is ruled into columns, headed with item descriptions and arranged in the order the items will appear in the bill of quantities. A well prepared abstract makes billing quick and accurate, and it provides a clear audit trail from every bill item back to the original dimensions. This topic covers the formats of abstract sheets, how to organise measurements on them, how the standard methods of measurement shape the abstract, and how to review it for accuracy.
An abstracting format is the layout of the abstract sheet: its size, ruling, headings and the way each item column is divided for additions and deductions. Traditionally, abstracts are prepared on large ruled sheets (often A3 or double foolscap) divided into vertical columns, each column holding one item, with sub-columns for additions and for deductions marked "Dd". Today, the same layout is reproduced in spreadsheets or quantity surveying software, but the principles remain. Example: a quantity surveying firm preparing the bill for a county assembly office block uses a spreadsheet abstract that copies the traditional columns, with each item's description at the head and its plus and deduction quantities below.
| Concrete Class 20 in foundations (m³) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ref | Add | Dd |
| 2/3 | 12.60 | |
| 2/9 | 4.32 | |
| 3/2 | 0.54 | |
| Totals | 16.92 | 0.54 |
| Format | Description | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional ruled abstract paper | Large paper ruled into item columns | Clear audit trail, no software needed | Slow, needs careful handwriting, hard to amend |
| Spreadsheet abstract | Columns in a spreadsheet with formulas for totals | Fast, easy to sort and amend, automatic addition | Formula errors can go unnoticed |
| Quantity surveying software | Dimensions entered once and abstracted automatically | Very fast, links directly to the bill | Cost of software and training |
| Cut-and-shuffle slips | Each dimension on a slip, sorted by item (alternative to abstracting) | Suits large projects with many takers-off | Slips can be lost |
Organizing measurements means arranging the item columns and the entries within them in a logical, consistent order so that anyone can follow the abstract and transfer it to the bill without confusion. The usual rule is to follow the order of the bill: by work section or element, then within each section in the order of the standard method of measurement, and within each group from cubic to square, linear and enumerated items. Entries are written neatly, referenced, and kept aligned so additions and deductions are never mixed. Example: an assistant quantity surveyor abstracting the substructure of a teachers' housing project for a church-sponsored school lists excavation items first, then disposal, filling, concrete, formwork, reinforcement and masonry, matching the bill order.
The Standard Method of Measurement (SMM) for building works and the Civil Engineering Standard Method of Measurement (CESMM) set out how work is divided into sections, classified, described and measured, and in which units. Applying them to the abstract means grouping items into the correct work sections or classes, keeping items separate wherever the standard requires separate measurement, using the stated units and following the standard's order, so that the abstract converts directly into a compliant bill. In Kenya, building projects commonly use the Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works for East Africa, while civil engineering contracts such as roads and water works use CESMM. Example: on a water supply project for a rural water company, the abstract follows CESMM classes, keeping pipework (Class I) separate by diameter and depth band as CESMM requires.
Reviewing abstracting accuracy means checking the completed abstract to make sure every squared dimension has been transferred once and only once, into the correct column, with the correct sign, and that all columns have been added correctly. Errors at this stage pass straight into the bill and can cost the client or the contractor heavily, so a systematic check, preferably by a second person, is essential before billing. Example: before issuing the tender bill for a dairy processing plant, the senior quantity surveyor checks a junior's abstract, finds a deduction for a door opening entered as an addition and corrects it before billing.
Given: The column "Concrete Class 20 in foundations (m³)" has additions of 12.60, 4.32 and 3.15 m³ and a deduction of 0.54 m³. The abstractor recorded total additions of 19.97 m³. Check the casting.
Total additions = 12.60 + 4.32 + 3.15
Total additions = 20.07 m³
Answer: The recorded total of 19.97 m³ is wrong by 0.10 m³; the correct total additions are 20.07 m³, with deductions of 0.54 m³ carried separately for reduction.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountAt the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.