By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you deliver training that truly supports users in managing electronic repositories efficiently, making you a valuable asset in any tech-focused workplace.
Electronic repositories have become essential in Kenyan libraries and information centres, providing organized digital access to scholarly articles, theses, reports, and institutional records. Training users on how to navigate these repositories effectively ensures they can maximize the value of the resources available. This chapter focuses on designing and conducting user training tailored to diverse user groups, ensuring that learning outcomes match user needs and that training materials are relevant and accessible.
User training in electronic repository management begins with clear objectives that guide the learning process. In the Kenyan context, users range from university students and researchers to public service officers and community members, each with unique requirements. Defining precise training objectives ensures that sessions address these varied needs, equipping users with the knowledge and skills necessary to retrieve and manage digital information efficiently.
In a library or documentation centre, training objectives act as the contract between the information professional and the user. They tell the trainer what to teach, tell the user what to expect, and give the library a standard against which to judge whether the training worked. Example: a university library that introduces a new institutional repository may set the objective that every postgraduate student can submit a thesis and retrieve a past project report without help from staff.
Learning outcomes specify what participants should know or be able to do after training, focusing on measurable skills and knowledge that reflect user needs. They are written from the point of view of the user, not the trainer, and usually begin with the phrase "By the end of the session, the user will be able to..." followed by an action verb such as search, filter, upload, download or cite. Example: "By the end of the session, the user will be able to locate three policy documents in the repository using the title and subject fields."
Features of well-written learning outcomes:
Objectives are only useful when they respond to what users actually struggle with or need to do. Aligning objectives with user needs means finding out who the users are, what tasks they perform in the repository, and where they have gaps, then writing objectives that close those gaps. Example: if reference desk records show that lecturers often ask how to deposit conference papers, an objective on the deposit procedure belongs in the lecturers' training, but may be unnecessary for first-year students.
Ways of identifying user needs before setting objectives:
Each objective should state how far the user is expected to progress, because "knowing about" a repository is very different from using it independently. Specifying levels prevents under-training, where users leave unable to perform tasks, and over-training, where beginners are overwhelmed. Example: a community member may only need to reach the level of finding and downloading a document, while a repository administrator must reach the level of managing records and metadata.
The table below shows a simple set of levels that can be applied to repository training.
| Level | What the user can do | Example in repository training |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness | Recognise the repository and its purpose | Names the repository and explains what types of documents it holds |
| Understanding | Explain features and terms in own words | Explains the difference between title, author and subject searches |
| Application | Perform a task with a guide or checklist | Searches, filters and downloads a report following a handout |
| Independent use | Perform tasks correctly without help | Submits a thesis with complete metadata and the correct file format |
| Advanced or expert use | Solve new problems and support others | Builds complex searches with Boolean operators and trains colleagues |
Points to keep in mind when setting levels:
A training programme is the organised plan that brings together the objectives, content, participants, resources and assessment for repository user training. It turns a set of good intentions into a document that the library can follow, review and repeat. Example: an academic library may prepare a repository user training programme for the new academic year covering first-year students, postgraduate researchers and teaching staff, each with its own objectives and materials.
Main components of a training programme:
Steps in drawing up a training programme:
The curriculum is the detailed content of the training programme: the topics, the order in which they are taught, the activities and the materials. A good repository curriculum follows the objectives closely, so that every topic exists because it supports a stated outcome. Example: if an objective is that users can submit a thesis, the curriculum must include topics on file preparation, metadata entry and the submission workflow, together with a practice submission.
Core topics are the essential subjects every user must master to use the repository effectively. They are chosen by comparing the objectives with the repository's functions and the tasks users perform. Example: a researcher who cannot use filters will waste time on thousands of irrelevant results, so filtering belongs in the core content.
Typical core topics:
Practical exercises give users the chance to apply each topic immediately, which strengthens memory and builds confidence. The curriculum should pair every core topic with at least one exercise so that learning is not limited to listening. Example: after the topic on search techniques, participants are given a research question and must retrieve three relevant reports using a Boolean search.
Practical exercises to build into the curriculum:
Customising training means adjusting the content, depth, language and materials so that each group learns what is useful to it. One standard course delivered to everyone usually bores advanced users and loses beginners. Example: a session for secondary school teachers using the repository for teaching resources will differ from one for postgraduate researchers depositing theses.
User groups differ in prior experience, tasks and the time they can give to training. Content should be selected and pitched to match these differences while still covering the objectives set for the group. Example: a group of first-year students may spend most of the session on basic search and downloading, while a group of research staff covers deposit procedures and metadata quality.
The table below compares how training may differ for two levels of user.
| Aspect | Beginners | Advanced users |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Basic computer and internet use, introduction to what a repository is | Familiar with searching, need deeper features |
| Main topics | Navigation, simple search, downloading, citing | Boolean and field searching, metadata, submission, alerts, managing collections |
| Pace | Slower, with repetition and step-by-step demonstration | Faster, with more time for exploration and problem-solving |
| Exercises | Guided tasks with clear instructions | Open tasks, case studies and peer support roles |
| Expected outcome | Retrieves and saves needed documents independently | Searches precisely, contributes content and helps others |
Other ways of grouping users:
Training materials include handouts, slides, exercise sheets, quick reference guides and demonstration records. They should be adjusted so that each group can understand and use them easily, both during and after the session. Example: a one-page quick guide with screenshots showing how to search and download a thesis may be more useful to a beginner than a long manual.
Ways of adapting materials:
A well-structured training program organizes learning activities to achieve the defined objectives systematically. In Kenyan libraries, training programs must accommodate diverse learners and resource constraints.
Training programs should be structured into modules covering topics such as repository navigation, search strategies, and content contribution. The duration must balance depth with user availability, often requiring short-focused sessions.
Programs can be delivered face-to-face, online, or blended, depending on user access to technology. For example, a county library may combine in-person workshops with online tutorials.
Scheduling should consider users’ work or study hours, with options for weekend or evening sessions to maximize attendance.
Hands-on practice with the repository during training enhances skill acquisition, such as live search demonstrations or guided uploads.
Programs should include mechanisms to monitor attendance and evaluate learning outcomes through quizzes or practical tasks.
Curriculum development translates training objectives into a detailed content plan. It guides trainers and ensures comprehensive coverage of necessary skills.
A curriculum framework outlines key topics and subtopics, ensuring logical progression from basic to advanced concepts.
Content should be relevant to the repository system in use and user needs, such as metadata standards or copyright guidelines for digital content.
The curriculum should specify resources like manuals, videos, and practice datasets to support diverse learning styles.
Including formative and summative assessments within the curriculum helps track learning progress and identify areas needing reinforcement.
Regular reviews ensure the curriculum remains current with technological updates and user feedback, as practiced by the Kenya National Library Service.
Aligning training objectives with user needs ensures that training is relevant and addresses actual challenges faced by users in accessing electronic repositories.
Before defining objectives, training coordinators should assess users’ current skills and information needs through surveys or interviews, as done at Nairobi University Library.
Different user groups such as undergraduate students, postgraduate researchers, and library staff have distinct needs that must be reflected in objectives.
Objectives should prioritize skills that enhance users’ ability to locate, evaluate, and use repository content effectively, especially for academic research and policy formulation.
Training objectives should also align with the institution’s goals, such as promoting open access publishing or increasing repository deposits.
Continuous feedback from users post-training helps refine objectives to better meet evolving needs.
Specifying the expected knowledge and skill levels allows trainers to design sessions that are neither too basic nor too advanced, optimizing learning outcomes.
For new users, skills may include basic navigation, simple searches, and understanding repository terminology.
Intermediate users should master advanced search techniques, use of Boolean operators, and customization of search alerts.
Advanced users need skills in metadata management, uploading content, and repository administration functions.
Kenya’s digital literacy frameworks can guide the specification of knowledge and skill levels to ensure consistency and relevance.
Customization ensures training resonates with users’ experience levels, roles, and information goals, increasing effectiveness.
Training content must be adapted to the specific needs of various user groups to optimize learning outcomes.
Beginner users require foundational knowledge, such as understanding repository purpose, basic navigation, and simple search techniques. For instance, new university students may benefit from step-by-step walkthroughs and glossary explanations.
Users with some repository experience need training on refining searches, using filters, and managing saved queries. Library assistants at a SACCO might focus on these skills to assist members effectively.
Advanced users, such as academic staff or repository managers, require training on content submission protocols, metadata editing, and repository customization.
Groups like researchers in health facilities or policy analysts in county offices may need domain-specific training emphasizing relevant content types and search strategies.
Providing pathways for users to progress from beginner to advanced levels supports sustained competency development.
Training materials must reflect users’ literacy levels, language preferences, and technological access to facilitate comprehension and engagement.
Materials should use clear, locally understood language avoiding jargon, or provide explanations for technical terms. For example, Kiswahili versions or bilingual materials can improve accessibility in county libraries.
Materials should be available in multiple formats, including printed handouts, PDFs, and video tutorials, accommodating users with varying internet connectivity.
Using screenshots, flowcharts, and Kenyan context examples enhances understanding. A case study on accessing agricultural research at a cooperative can illustrate search methods effectively.
Incorporating quizzes, practice exercises, and discussion prompts encourages active learning and retention.
Materials should be regularly updated to reflect software upgrades or changes in repository policies, ensuring ongoing relevance.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter focused on the essential steps for conducting effective electronic repository database user training. It began with defining clear training objectives by establishing specific learning outcomes that align with the needs of different user groups while specifying the knowledge and skill levels to be achieved. The development of a comprehensive training program involved creating a detailed curriculum tailored to these objectives and customizing the content to address various user requirements, such as differentiating between beginners and advanced users. The chapter then covered the scheduling and implementation of training sessions, emphasizing the importance of creating a well-structured timetable. Various session formats were explored, including in-person training, online webinars, video tutorials, and blended learning approaches to accommodate diverse learning preferences. Finally, the chapter addressed the delivery of training sessions with effective presentations designed to enhance user understanding and engagement with the electronic repository system.
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.