By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
These skills will help you deliver precise and reliable survey results, which are essential for successful projects in the hydrographic surveying trade.
Conducting a shore control survey is a fundamental phase in hydrographic surveying that establishes accurate reference points on land to support marine and coastal mapping activities. This chapter focuses on the methodologies used in shore control surveys, which are critical for ensuring the precision and reliability of hydrographic data. For land survey professionals in Kenya, especially those working along the Indian Ocean coastline or the shores of large lakes such as Victoria and Turkana, understanding shore control methods is essential to support projects ranging from port development to environmental monitoring. Accurate shore control facilitates the integration of terrestrial and hydrographic data, enabling effective planning and management of Kenya’s water-based resources.
The choice of shore control survey methods depends on the terrain, accuracy requirements, available equipment, and project scope. In Kenya, where coastal environments vary from sandy beaches to rocky cliffs and mangrove swamps, surveyors must adapt their methods to suit these conditions while maintaining data integrity. Shore control surveys provide the framework of fixed points that hydrographic surveys reference to ensure spatial consistency between land and water data sets. The following subtopics delve into the primary shore control survey methods, highlighting their principles, practical application, and challenges faced in Kenyan contexts.
Geodetic control surveys provide the highest level of positional accuracy by establishing a network of control points with known coordinates tied to national geodetic datums. These surveys use precise instruments such as total stations and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) receivers to determine exact positions on the shore, which are essential for referencing hydrographic surveys.
In coastal counties like Mombasa and Kilifi, geodetic control surveys are critical for port expansions and coastal erosion studies. For example, surveyors working for the Kenya Ports Authority rely on geodetic control networks to ensure that dredging and construction align with approved plans. Similarly, in Lake Victoria’s Kisumu County, geodetic control is used to monitor shoreline changes affecting local fisheries.
Trigonometric surveying uses measurements of angles and distances between known points to calculate the position of new points on the shore. This method is particularly useful where GNSS signals are weak or obstructed, such as in dense mangrove areas or steep coastal cliffs.
Trigonometric methods are widely applied in areas like the Lamu Archipelago, where dense vegetation and rugged terrain limit GNSS effectiveness. Surveyors working on environmental impact assessments for coastal infrastructure projects use this method to establish control points on inaccessible shorelines. The technique’s reliance on clear lines of sight means that survey teams must carefully select station locations, sometimes involving community engagement to access private or protected lands.
Differential leveling is a precise method for determining elevation differences between points on the shore, which is essential for linking terrestrial heights with hydrographic depths. Accurate elevation control supports the calculation of water depths relative to a common vertical datum, facilitating reliable charting and coastal engineering.
At Mtwapa Creek near Kilifi, differential leveling is used to establish shore benchmarks that support tidal monitoring and sediment transport studies. Surveyors working with the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) rely on these benchmarks to assess sea level rise impacts on coastal communities. The precision of differential leveling ensures that hydrographic surveys accurately reflect shoreline topography and water depths.
Advancements in photogrammetry and remote sensing provide innovative shore control methods by extracting spatial information from aerial photographs, drones, or satellite imagery. These techniques complement traditional ground surveys by covering large, inaccessible areas efficiently.
The Kenya Wildlife Service employs drone-based photogrammetry to map the shores of Lake Naivasha for conservation planning. Similarly, county governments along the coastline use satellite imagery to monitor erosion and illegal reclamation activities. These remote sensing methods reduce field time and enhance the spatial coverage of shore control surveys, though they depend heavily on accurate GCPs established through ground surveys.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter covered the essential methods used in conducting shore control surveys, highlighting the various approaches to accurately establish reference points on land for hydrographic work. It detailed the specific tools, equipment, and materials necessary for these surveys, including their functions and how they contribute to precision in measurements. The process of carrying out a shore control survey was explained step-by-step, emphasizing the importance of careful planning, data collection, and verification to ensure reliable results. Attention was given to the procedures for setting up control stations and maintaining their stability throughout the survey period. Finally, the chapter addressed the preparation of a comprehensive shore control survey report, outlining the key components that document the survey findings, data accuracy, and any challenges encountered during the operation. This report serves as a critical reference for subsequent hydrographic data collection and analysis.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Surveyor's level (Automatic level) | |
| Tripod stand | |
| Levelling staff graduated in meters and centimeters | |
| Measuring tape 30m steel | |
| Plumb bob with string | |
| Survey pegs (wooden) | |
| Permanent marker pen | |
| Notebook for recording observations | |
| Safety boots | |
| Reflective vest |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surveyor's level (Automatic level) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Tripod stand | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Levelling staff graduated in meters and centimeters | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Measuring tape 30m steel | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Plumb bob with string | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Survey pegs (wooden) | 10 Pcs per Candidate |
| 7 | Permanent marker pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Notebook for recording observations | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Safety boots | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 10 | Reflective vest | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Identification and preparation of PPE | |||
| Identified and wore safety boots correctly (Award 1 mark for correct use of safety boots) | 1 | ||
| Wore reflective vest appropriately (Award 1 mark for wearing reflective vest properly) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| TASK 2: Identification and inspection of survey equipment | |||
| Identified surveyor's level and checked for cleanliness and damage (Award 2 marks for correct identification and inspection) | 2 | ||
| Checked tripod stand for stability and damage (Award 1 mark for proper inspection) | 1 | ||
| Inspected levelling staff for clear graduations and no damage (Award 1 mark for proper inspection) | 1 | ||
| Checked measuring tape for full length and proper rewind (Award 1 mark for correct inspection) | 1 | ||
| Inspected plumb bob string for integrity and bob for damage (Award 1 mark for correct inspection) | 1 | ||
| Checked survey pegs for suitability and absence of damage (Award 1 mark for correct inspection) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| TASK 3: Preparation of survey equipment for use | |||
| Assembled and mounted the level on the tripod correctly (Award 2 marks for correct assembly and mounting) | 2 | ||
| Levelled the instrument by adjusting tripod legs and spirit bubble (Award 2 marks for accurate levelling) | 2 | ||
| Prepared levelling staff and measuring tape for use (Award 1 mark for readiness of levelling staff and tape) | 1 | ||
| Organized survey pegs and marker pen for marking points (Award 1 mark for readiness of pegs and markers) | 1 | ||
| Prepared notebook for recording survey observations (Award 1 mark for notebook readiness) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Tools and equipment are clean, functional, and ready for shore control survey (Award 3 marks for complete readiness and proper condition of all equipment) | 3 | ||
| PPE worn correctly and visibly (Award 2 marks for correct PPE use) | 2 | ||
| Survey pegs and markers prepared for marking shore control points (Award 2 marks for proper preparation of marking tools) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 23 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Dumpy Level | Field Book and Pencil |
| Tripod Stand | High Visibility Reflective Vest |
| Surveying Staff (3m graduated) | Safety Boots |
| Measuring Tape (30m steel) | |
| Pegging Hammer | |
| Survey Pegs (wooden) |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dumpy Level | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Tripod Stand | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Surveying Staff (3m graduated) | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 4 | Measuring Tape (30m steel) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Pegging Hammer | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Survey Pegs (wooden) | 10 Pcs per Candidate |
| 7 | Field Book and Pencil | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 8 | High Visibility Reflective Vest | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Safety Boots | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Preparation and Safety | |||
| Identified and used PPE appropriately including reflective vest and safety boots (Award 1 mark for each PPE used correctly = 2 Marks) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| TASK 2: Site Selection and Marking Control Points | |||
| Selected a suitable linear shoreline section with minimal obstacles (Award 1 mark for correct site selection) | 1 | ||
| Marked five control points (A, B, C, D, E) 10 meters apart along the shore using wooden pegs (Award 1 mark for each correctly positioned and pegged point = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 4 | ||
| TASK 3: Establishment of Temporary Benchmark (TBM) | |||
| Established a Temporary Benchmark near the control points and pegged it (Award 1 mark for TBM pegged correctly) | 1 | ||
| Recorded a Reduced Level of 500.00 m on the TBM (Award 1 mark for correct RL assignment) | 1 | ||
| Sub-Total | 2 | ||
| TASK 4: Instrument Setup and Leveling | |||
| Set up the Dumpy Level on the tripod at a suitable central location (Award 1 mark for correct setup location) | 1 | ||
| Mounted and leveled the instrument with care, ensuring the spirit bubble is centered (Award 2 marks for correct mounting and leveling) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 3 | ||
| TASK 5: Measurement and Booking | |||
| Measured baseline distances between control points accurately using measuring tape (Award 1 mark for each correctly measured segment = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Booked measurements correctly in the field book using standard format (Award 2 marks for correct booking format and clarity) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 5 | ||
| TASK 6: Arithmetic Reduction and Checks | |||
| Performed arithmetic checks on baseline measurements to ensure accuracy (Award 3 marks for correct calculations and checks) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 3 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Baseline distances between points A, B, C, D, and E are recorded correctly with 10m spacing ± 0.05m tolerance (Award 5 marks for accuracy within tolerance) | 5 | ||
| Temporary Benchmark established and clearly marked with correct Reduced Level of 500.00 m (Award 3 marks for correct TBM marking and RL) | 3 | ||
| Field book entries are neat, complete, and follow standard booking format (Award 3 marks for neatness and completeness) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 11 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 30 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.