By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering these skills will help you create beautiful, functional interiors that meet client needs and bring your creative ideas to life in the real world.
The process of performing design research is fundamental to the practice of interior design, particularly in Kenya where diverse cultural, climatic, and socio-economic factors influence spatial use and aesthetics. Interior designers must ground their creative decisions on comprehensive research to ensure that spaces are functional, culturally relevant, and sustainable. This chapter introduces the principles of research design tailored to interior design projects and explores spatial planning and site analysis as foundational elements that inform successful interventions.
Research design in interior design establishes the structured approach by which information is gathered, analyzed, and applied to solve design problems. In the Kenyan context, where projects often intersect with local traditions, environmental conditions, and resource constraints, a robust research design helps designers develop solutions that are both innovative and context-sensitive. This section covers the meaning, purpose, types, and key considerations of research design relevant to interior designers.
Research design refers to the overall strategy and framework that guides the collection and analysis of data to address specific research questions in interior design projects. It defines how the designer will systematically investigate the needs, conditions, and constraints of a space to create functional and aesthetic environments.
Research design serves as the blueprint for conducting systematic inquiry, ensuring that design decisions are evidence-based and contextually appropriate. It underpins the credibility and relevance of the interior design solution.
Different projects require different research approaches. Interior designers must select a design that aligns with their objectives and the nature of the inquiry.
Designers must account for practical and ethical factors that influence the success of research.
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter explores the fundamentals of creating and performing design research within interior design. It begins by introducing the concept of research design, emphasizing the importance of spatial planning and site analysis to inform effective project development. The process of structuring a project report is detailed, followed by the formulation of a comprehensive design program that guides the creative process. Legislative requirements are examined extensively, covering building codes, health and safety regulations, zoning laws, environmental standards, permits, accessibility mandates, fire safety, and workplace compliance. Understanding space needs and standards is crucial for functional design solutions, and the chapter highlights various sources of research including historical and contemporary precedents alongside socio-cultural factors. Multiple methods of design presentation are presented, ranging from traditional hand sketches to advanced AI-generated modelling, ensuring clear communication of ideas. Finally, the chapter addresses provisional project costing and the importance of cost control processes to maintain budgetary discipline throughout project execution.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Measuring tape (minimum 30m) | Graph paper A4 size |
| Graph paper A4 size | |
| HB pencil | |
| 2B pencil | |
| Eraser | |
| Sharpener | |
| Architectural scale ruler (metric) | |
| Clipboard or drawing board | |
| Digital camera or smartphone for site photos |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measuring tape (minimum 30m) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Graph paper A4 size | 4 Pcs per Candidate |
| 3 | HB pencil | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | 2B pencil | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Eraser | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Sharpener | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Architectural scale ruler (metric) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Clipboard or drawing board | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Digital camera or smartphone for site photos | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 10 | Measuring wheel (optional) | 1 Pc per 5 Candidates |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Conduct Site Inspection and Measurements | |||
| Wore appropriate PPE before site inspection (Award 2 marks for correct PPE use) | 2 | ||
| Assembled and organized all required tools and materials before starting (Award 2 marks for proper preparation) | 2 | ||
| Measured site boundaries accurately using measuring tape or wheel (Award up to 5 marks for accuracy and completeness) | 5 | ||
| Recorded all measurements clearly and legibly on graph paper (Award 3 marks for clear and accurate recording) | 3 | ||
| Identified and noted existing site features such as trees, slopes, and access points (Award 4 marks for comprehensive site feature identification) | 4 | ||
| Captured clear site photographs to supplement spatial analysis (Award 2 marks for relevant and clear photos) | 2 | ||
| Ensured working area was clean and tools were properly stored after completion (Award 2 marks for good housekeeping) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| TASK 2: Prepare Spatial Analysis Report | |||
| Listed all required spaces for a standard residential house per Kenyan space standards (Award 5 marks for complete and correct listing) | 5 | ||
| Analyzed adjacency relationships logically between spaces (Award 5 marks for correct adjacency analysis) | 5 | ||
| Calculated space requirements accurately based on standard dimensions (Award 5 marks for correct calculations) | 5 | ||
| Presented the spatial analysis report neatly with clear headings and labels (Award 3 marks for neat, legible presentation) | 3 | ||
| Used architectural scale ruler correctly to represent spatial data (Award 2 marks for correct scale usage) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Spatial analysis report includes accurate site measurements: length 15000mm, width 10000mm (Award 5 marks for correct and complete site measurements) | 5 | ||
| Report contains a comprehensive list of spaces with correct area calculations per space (Award 5 marks for completeness and accuracy of space list and calculations) | 5 | ||
| Adjacency analysis clearly shows logical and functional space relationships (Award 5 marks for logical adjacency representation) | 5 | ||
| Drawings and sketches are clear, legible, and correctly scaled using architectural scale ruler (Award 5 marks for clarity, legibility, and correct scale) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 20 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 60 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| HB Pencil | A4 Drawing Paper |
| 2B Pencil | A3 Drawing Paper |
| Eraser | |
| Sharpener | |
| Ruler | |
| Colored Pencils/Crayons | |
| Computer with Design and Drafting CAD Software | |
| Flash Disk Storage |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A4 Drawing Paper | 4 Pcs per Candidate |
| 2 | HB Pencil | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | 2B Pencil | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Eraser | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Sharpener | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Ruler | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Colored Pencils/Crayons | 1 Packet per Candidate |
| 8 | Computer with Design and Drafting CAD Software | 1 Pc per 5 Candidates |
| 9 | Flash Disk Storage - 16 GB | 1 Pc per 5 Candidates |
| 10 | A3 Drawing Paper | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Prepare Project Structure | |||
| Prepared and organized all required tools and materials before starting (Award 2 marks for correct preparation and organization) | 2 | ||
| Analyzed the client brief and identified key project objectives (Award 3 marks for thorough analysis of client requirements) | 3 | ||
| Developed a clear and logical project outline including phases and milestones (Award 5 marks for clarity and completeness of project structure) | 5 | ||
| Included timeframes and deadlines for each project phase (Award 3 marks for appropriate and realistic scheduling) | 3 | ||
| Presented the project structure neatly and legibly on A3 drawing paper (Award 2 marks for neatness and legibility) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 15 | ||
| TASK 2: Develop Detailed Design Program | |||
| Listed all required spaces and functions based on client needs (Award 4 marks for completeness of space listing) | 4 | ||
| Analyzed and indicated adjacency relationships between spaces (Award 4 marks for accurate adjacency analysis) | 4 | ||
| Prepared a functional bubble diagram showing spatial relationships (Award 5 marks for logical and clear bubble diagram) | 5 | ||
| Used colors appropriately to distinguish functional areas in the diagram (Award 3 marks for balanced and effective color use) | 3 | ||
| Drafted a detailed design program including space sizes, finishes, and furniture needs (Award 5 marks for detail and accuracy in design program) | 5 | ||
| Saved and submitted the design program and diagrams in PDF format on flash disk (Award 3 marks for correct saving and submission) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 24 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Project structure is complete, logically organized, and matches client brief (Award 5 marks for completeness and client alignment) | 5 | ||
| Design program includes all required spaces with accurate adjacency and size dimensions (Award 7 marks for accuracy and completeness of design program) | 7 | ||
| Functional bubble diagram is clear, correctly labeled, and shows logical flow (Award 5 marks for clarity and correctness of bubble diagram) | 5 | ||
| Final presentation is neat, legible, and professional on A3 paper with correct scale of 1200mm x 900mm (Award 4 marks for presentation quality and scale accuracy) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 21 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 60 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.