Casting inspection is a critical process in mechanical production, ensuring that manufactured parts meet quality standards and function reliably in their intended applications. For Mechanical Production Technicians in Kenya, understanding casting defects is essential to identify faults early, minimize wastage, and maintain production efficiency. This chapter covers common casting defects encountered in foundry works, focusing on their causes, characteristics, and implications in the Kenyan industrial context.
8.2 Casting Defects
Casting defects are imperfections that occur during the metal casting process, affecting the integrity, appearance, and performance of the final product. In Kenya's manufacturing and repair workshops, such defects often lead to costly rework or scrapping of components, impacting project timelines and budgets. Recognizing these defects allows technicians to implement corrective measures and improve foundry operations.
8.2.1 Porosity Defects
Porosity refers to the presence of small voids or cavities within a casting, which weaken the structure and may cause failure under stress. These defects are common in ferrous and non-ferrous castings produced in Kenyan workshops serving sectors like automotive repair and agricultural machinery fabrication.
Causes of Porosity
- Gas Entrapment: During solidification, gases such as hydrogen or air become trapped inside the molten metal, forming bubbles that remain as pores. This often results from moisture in the sand mold or inadequate venting.
- Shrinkage Cavities: As metal solidifies and contracts, insufficient feeding of molten metal creates voids inside the casting.
- Turbulent Pouring: Pouring molten metal too quickly or from excessive height causes turbulence, trapping air and forming porosity.
- Chemical Reactions: Reactions between molten metal and mold materials can produce gases that contribute to porosity.
- Inadequate Degassing: Failure to remove dissolved gases from molten metal before pouring increases porosity risk.
Types of Porosity
- Blowholes: Large rounded cavities caused by trapped gas bubbles, visible on the surface or within the casting.
- Pinholes: Small, pin-sized holes distributed over the casting surface, often caused by moisture or gas release.
- Pipe Porosity: Internal cavities formed by shrinkage during solidification, typically located at the thickest part of the casting.
- Cluster Porosity: Groupings of small pores concentrated in one area, weakening that section.
- Surface Porosity: Voids open to the surface, which may cause leakages in fluid-carrying components.
Detection Methods
- Visual Inspection: Surface porosity can often be detected by careful examination for pinholes or blowholes.
- Dye Penetrant Testing: Applying dye helps reveal surface-connected pores.
- Radiographic Inspection: X-rays reveal internal porosity and shrinkage cavities.
- Ultrasonic Testing: Sound waves detect internal voids, especially useful for critical components.
- Pressure Testing: Fluid or air pressure tests identify leaks caused by porosity in castings like pump housings.
Effects on Casting Performance
- Reduced Strength: Voids compromise the load-bearing capacity of castings, risking premature failure.
- Leakage: Porosity in fluid-containing parts such as valves leads to leaks and operational inefficiency.
- Poor Surface Finish: Surface porosity affects machining and finishing processes, increasing production costs.
- Corrosion Susceptibility: Voids trap moisture and contaminants, accelerating corrosion.
- Rejection and Rework: Castings with significant porosity often require repair or scrapping, increasing costs.
8.2.2 Shrinkage Defect
Shrinkage defects occur due to volume reduction as molten metal solidifies and cools, leading to cavities or voids within the casting. These defects are particularly troublesome in large or thick castings common in heavy machinery components fabricated by Kenyan foundries.
Mechanism of Shrinkage
During solidification, metal contracts; if molten metal feeding is insufficient, internal cavities form to compensate for volume loss. This process is influenced by the metal’s thermal properties and mold design.
Types of Shrinkage Defects
- Shrinkage Cavities: Internal voids usually located in thicker sections where cooling is slower.
- Shrinkage Porosity: A network of small interconnected voids caused by inadequate feeding.
- Surface Shrinkage: Depressions or dimples on the casting surface due to volume loss.
- Hot Tears: Cracks formed due to restrained shrinkage stresses (covered separately).
- Pipe Shrinkage: A funnel-shaped cavity near the riser region caused by metal solidification from the mold walls inward.
Causes of Shrinkage Defects
- Inadequate Riser Design: Risers that do not supply enough molten metal during solidification lead to shrinkage cavities.
- Improper Mold Design: Thick sections with uneven cooling rates promote shrinkage.
- Rapid Cooling: Uneven cooling causes internal stresses that exacerbate shrinkage.
- Incorrect Pouring Temperature: Pouring metal at too high or low temperature affects solidification patterns.
- Poor Feeding System: Insufficient gating and riser systems fail to compensate for volume changes.
Prevention Techniques
- Riser Optimization: Designing risers with adequate size and placement to feed molten metal during shrinkage.
- Uniform Section Thickness: Avoiding abrupt thickness changes to ensure even cooling.
- Controlled Pouring Temperature: Maintaining optimal metal temperature to promote proper solidification.
- Use of Chills: Inserting chills to accelerate cooling in thick sections and minimize shrinkage.
- Improved Mold Venting: Allowing gases to escape helps reduce shrinkage porosity.
8.2.3 Warping
Warping is the distortion of a casting from its intended shape during cooling due to uneven contraction or residual stresses. This defect affects dimensional accuracy and fit, critical in precision parts used in sectors like automotive assembly and agricultural equipment manufacturing in Kenya.
Causes of Warping
- Uneven Cooling Rates: Differential cooling between thick and thin sections causes uneven contraction.
- Residual Stresses: Internal stresses induced during solidification and cooling lead to deformation.
- Improper Mold Support: Inadequate support during cooling allows the casting to bend or twist.
- Material Composition: Certain alloys have higher susceptibility to warping due to their thermal properties.
- Design Flaws: Complex shapes with asymmetric sections increase warping risk.
Types of Warping
- Bending: Curving of flat sections resulting in a bow-like shape.
- Twisting: Torsional distortion around the casting’s longitudinal axis.
- Buckling: Localized deformation causing surface irregularities.
- Dimensional Change: Overall change in length, width, or height beyond tolerance.
- Residual Stress Warping: Warping occurring after machining due to release of internal stresses.
Effects on Casting Quality
- Poor Assembly Fit: Warped parts fail to align correctly with mating components.
- Reduced Mechanical Performance: Stress concentrations from warping can cause premature failure.
- Increased Machining Costs: Additional processing is needed to correct distortions.
- Rejection of Castings: Severe warping often leads to scrapping, increasing costs.
- Delays in Production: Warping defects cause rework and slow down manufacturing schedules.
Minimizing Warping
- Controlled Cooling: Using uniform cooling techniques such as insulated molds or gradual cooling.
- Proper Mold Design: Ensuring symmetrical sections and adequate support.
- Material Selection: Choosing alloys with low thermal expansion for critical components.
- Stress Relieving Treatments: Post-casting heat treatments to reduce residual stresses.
- Accurate Pattern Making: Designing patterns to compensate for expected shrinkage and warping.
8.2.4 Sinks
Sinks are depressions or localized surface depressions on castings caused by surface shrinkage or improper solidification. They compromise surface finish and dimensional accuracy, affecting aesthetics and functionality of cast components.
Formation of Sinks
Sinks form when the surface metal solidifies too quickly while the interior metal shrinks, pulling the surface inward. This is common in sections with uneven thickness or poor feeding.
Causes of Sink Defects
- Thick Sections with Thin Skins: Rapid cooling of thin surfaces over thick sections causes surface sinking.
- Inadequate Feeding: Insufficient molten metal supply during solidification leads to surface depressions.
- Incorrect Mold Material: Using mold materials with poor thermal conductivity causes uneven cooling.
- Low Pouring Temperature: Premature solidification of surface metal before feeding is complete.
- Improper Riser Location: Risers placed too far from thick sections fail to feed adequately.
Types of Sink Marks
- Surface Sink: Visible depressions on the casting surface, often near thick sections.
- Internal Sink: Subsurface voids that may cause weakness but are not visible externally.
- Localized Sink: Small depressions confined to specific areas.
- General Sink: Widespread sinking affecting large surface areas.
- Shrinkage Sink: Caused specifically by volume reduction during solidification.
Prevention Methods
- Uniform Section Thickness: Designing castings with gradual thickness changes.
- Effective Feeding System: Proper riser design to supply molten metal during solidification.
- Appropriate Mold Materials: Using materials with consistent thermal properties.
- Controlled Pouring Temperature: Ensuring molten metal remains fluid until feeding completes.
- Use of Chills and Insulation: To balance cooling rates and reduce surface shrinkage.
8.2.5 Slag Inclusions
Slag inclusions are non-metallic impurities trapped within the casting, resulting in weak spots and surface defects. These defects are common in Kenyan foundries processing scrap metal or poorly refined raw materials.
Origin of Slag Inclusions
Slag forms from oxides, flux residues, or sand particles that do not separate from molten metal during pouring. Improper melting or handling increases slag presence.
Types of Slag Inclusions
- Surface Inclusions: Visible on the casting surface as rough patches or scabs.
- Internal Inclusions: Embedded within the casting, weakening internal structure.
- Stringer Inclusions: Long, thin slag streaks aligned with metal flow.
- Clustered Inclusions: Groups of slag particles concentrated in one area.
- Porous Inclusions: Slag entangled with gas porosity, causing complex defects.
Effects on Casting Integrity
- Reduced Mechanical Strength: Slag inclusions act as stress concentrators causing cracks.
- Poor Surface Finish: Surface inclusions affect machining and aesthetics.
- Corrosion Initiation Sites: Slag pockets trap moisture accelerating corrosion.
- Increased Rejection Rate: Castings with slag defects are often scrapped.
- Impaired Fatigue Resistance: Inclusion zones are prone to fatigue failure.
Control Measures
- Proper Melting Practices: Avoiding excessive oxidation and slag formation.
- Use of Clean Raw Materials: Minimizing contaminants in charge materials.
- Effective Skimming and Fluxing: Removing slag from molten metal before pouring.
- Filtration Systems: Using ceramic filters in gating systems to trap slag.
- Good Pouring Techniques: Pouring slowly to avoid stirring up slag.
8.2.6 Dross
Dross is a layer of oxidized metal and impurities that float on the molten metal surface. If incorporated into the casting, it causes inclusions and surface defects.
Formation of Dross
Dross forms due to reaction of molten metal with oxygen at high temperatures, creating oxide films and slag-like residues.
Characteristics of Dross
- Surface Layer: Appears as a scum or crust on the metal surface.
- Light and Porous: Less dense than molten metal, floats on top.
- Variable Composition: Contains oxides, slag, and metal droplets.
- Easily Disturbed: Can be stirred into molten metal by improper handling.
- Adherent to Mold: May stick to mold surfaces causing surface defects.
Impact on Casting Quality
- Inclusions: Dross trapped in casting reduces strength.
- Surface Imperfections: Causes roughness and scabs.
- Machining Difficulties: Hard oxide films damage cutting tools.
- Increased Scrap Rate: Castings with dross defects often rejected.
- Contamination of Melts: Leads to inconsistent casting quality.
Prevention and Removal
- Skimming: Regular removal of dross from molten metal surface.
- Protective Atmospheres: Using inert gases or fluxes to reduce oxidation.
- Proper Melting Temperature: Avoiding overheating that accelerates dross formation.
- Careful Pouring: Minimizing turbulence to prevent dross entrainment.
- Use of Fluxes: Chemical agents that bind oxides and facilitate removal.
8.2.7 Hot Tears
Hot tears are cracks that develop in a casting while it is still hot and cooling, due to tensile stresses exceeding the metal’s strength. These defects compromise mechanical integrity and are critical in structural components fabricated in Kenyan industries.
Formation Mechanism
Hot tears occur when the casting is restrained during cooling and contraction, causing tensile stresses that exceed the metal’s hot strength.
Factors Influencing Hot Tears
- High Thermal Gradients: Uneven cooling induces localized stresses.
- Poor Mold Design: Restrictive mold geometry prevents free contraction.
- Material Properties: Alloys with low ductility when hot are more prone.
- Section Thickness Variation: Sharp thickness changes cause differential contraction.
- Inadequate Feeding: Insufficient molten metal feeding leads to stress concentration.
Types of Hot Tears
- Linear Cracks: Straight cracks following stress lines.
- Branching Tears: Cracks with multiple branches extending from stress points.
- Surface Tears: Visible on the casting exterior.
- Internal Tears: Cracks inside the casting, detected by non-destructive testing.
- Intergranular Tears: Cracks along grain boundaries reducing toughness.
Mitigation Strategies
- Mold Design Optimization: Allowing uniform contraction and stress relief.
- Material Selection: Using alloys with better hot ductility.
- Controlled Cooling Rates: Reducing thermal gradients.
- Proper Feeding System: Ensuring continuous metal supply to relieve stresses.
- Post-Casting Heat Treatment: Relieving residual stresses.
8.2.8 Cold Shut
Cold shut is a defect formed when two streams of molten metal flow together but do not fuse properly, resulting in a weak line or seam in the casting. This defect is common in complex castings produced in Kenyan workshops with intricate gating systems.
Cause of Cold Shut
Cold shuts occur due to premature solidification of molten metal before fusion or low pouring temperature causing incomplete merging of metal fronts.
Characteristics of Cold Shut
- Visible Seam: A distinct line or ridge on the casting surface.
- Weak Joint: Reduced mechanical strength along the cold shut line.
- Surface Discontinuity: May cause leakages in fluid-carrying parts.
- Difficult to Detect Internally: Often requires dye penetrant or ultrasonic testing.
- Localized Defect: Confined to areas where metal streams meet.
Causes Related to Foundry Practice
- Low Pouring Temperature: Metal cools too quickly, preventing fusion.
- Slow Pouring Rate: Allows premature solidification before streams join.
- Poor Gating Design: Metal streams collide at low velocity or awkward angles.
- Contaminated Molten Metal: Oxides or slag prevent fusion.
- Inadequate Mold Venting: Trapped gases disrupt metal flow.
Prevention Techniques
- Maintain Optimal Pouring Temperature: Ensuring metal remains fluid for fusion.
- Design Efficient Gating Systems: Smooth and direct flow paths to avoid turbulence.
- Increase Pouring Speed: To prevent premature solidification.
- Proper Metal Cleaning: Removing oxides and slag before pouring.
- Improve Mold Venting: Allowing gases to escape and avoid metal front separation.
Practice Questions
-
Explain the main causes of porosity defects in casting and how they affect the mechanical properties of the final product. (10 marks)
-
Describe the different types of shrinkage defects and discuss two methods to prevent them in thick-section castings. (12 marks)
-
Identify four factors that contribute to warping in castings and explain how controlled cooling can minimize this defect. (10 marks)
-
What is slag inclusion in casting? Discuss its origin and two control measures used in Kenyan foundries. (8 marks)
-
Define cold shut and explain why low pouring temperature is a critical cause. Suggest two preventive measures. (10 marks)
The rest of this chapter
🔒Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free account 🔒8.3 Heat Treatment Processes
Heat treatment is a critical stage in foundry works that affects the mechanical properties and performance of castings. In Kenya, industries such as automotive component manufacturing, agricultural machinery production, and heavy equipment repair rely heavily…
🔒8.4 Finishing Process in Casting
In Kenya’s manufacturing and mechanical production sector, the finishing process in casting is crucial for transforming raw castings into functional components that meet precise dimensional and surface quality requirements. Mechanical Production Technicians wo…
🔒8.5 Inspection Report
Inspection reports are a critical deliverable in the casting process, serving as formal documentation of the findings from a casting inspection. For Mechanical Production Technicians in Kenya, especially those working in industries such as manufacturing plants…
Chapter Summary
This chapter covered the essential tools used for inspecting castings, including those for visual inspection, destructive testing, and non-destructive testing, each critical for evaluating casting quality. It explored various casting defects such as porosity, shrinkage, warping, sinks, slag inclusions, dross, hot tears, and cold shuts, explaining their causes and impacts on the final product. The discussion then shifted to heat treatment processes like annealing, normalizing, quenching, tempering, case hardening, and stress relieving, which modify the metal properties to achieve desired performance. Finishing processes including trimming, machining, grinding, fettling, and shot blasting were described as necessary steps to refine and prepare castings for use. Finally, the chapter emphasized the importance of compiling detailed inspection reports to document findings and ensure quality control in foundry operations.
Self-Assessment
🔒 PDFDownload this self-assessment, with answers
A. Written Assessment
- Identify three tools commonly used for visual inspection of castings and explain their specific uses. (6 marks)
- Describe the difference between destructive and non-destructive testing methods in casting inspection. Provide two examples of each. (8 marks)
🔒20 more in this section.
Chapter Examination Questions
🔒 PDFDownload these examination questions, with worked answers
SECTION A (40 Marks) - Answer ALL Questions
- Describe three essential tools used for visual inspection of castings and explain how each tool assists a Mechanical Production Technician at a county government workshop in detecting surface defects. (4 marks)
- Explain the role of destructive testing tools in casting inspection and give two examples of such tools commonly used in Kenyan foundries. (4 marks)
🔒18 more in this section.
Chapter Practical Activities
Practical 1: Visual Inspection of Castings for Surface Defects
Mechanical Production Technician · Level 6
Foundry Works
PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT
TIME: 4 HOURS
⬇ PDFCandidate Instructions (Candidate Tool)
Type: Individual
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATE:
1. You are required to perform the following task:
i. Perform visual inspection of two grey iron castings each approximately 150 mm x 100 mm x 50 mm to identify and record surface defects as per the provided inspection checklist.
2. You have been provided with the following resources for the practical task:
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|
| Magnifying glass (10x) | Sample castings (grey iron) |
| Flashlight (handheld) | Inspection checklist form |
| Steel ruler 300 mm | |
| Feeler gauge set | |
| Surface comparator chart | |
| Clear safety goggles | |
| Leather gloves | |
| Cotton cleaning cloth | |
| Broom and dustpan | |
⬇ PDFResources Required (Cutting List)
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|
| 1 | Sample castings (grey iron) | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 2 | Magnifying glass (10x) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Flashlight (handheld) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Steel ruler 300 mm | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Feeler gauge set (0.05 mm to 1 mm) | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 6 | Surface comparator chart | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Clear safety goggles | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 8 | Leather gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 9 | Cotton cleaning cloth | Enough per Candidate |
| 10 | Broom and dustpan for cleaning | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 11 | Inspection checklist form | 1 Pc per Candidate |
⬇ PDFAssessor Guide
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|
| TASK 1: Safety and Preparation |
Wore clear safety goggles and leather gloves (Award 1 mark for wearing all required PPE or zero) | 1 | | |
Prepared the inspection area and cleaned castings using cotton cloth (Award 1 mark for proper cleaning or zero) | 1 | | |
Checked and selected appropriate inspection tools (Award 1 mark for correct tool selection or zero) | 1 | | |
| Sub-Total | 3 | | |
| TASK 2: Visual Inspection Procedure |
Used magnifying glass and flashlight to inspect surface of castings (Award 2 marks for correct use of tools or zero) | 2 | | |
Measured surface defects using steel ruler and feeler gauges (Award 2 marks for accurate measurement or zero) | 2 | | |
Compared defects with surface comparator chart to identify defect types (Award 2 marks for correct defect identification or zero) | 2 | | |
Recorded all identified defects accurately on inspection checklist (Award 2 marks for accurate recording or zero) | 2 | | |
| Sub-Total | 8 | | |
| TASK 3: Housekeeping |
Cleaned the work area and returned all tools to designated places (Award 1 mark for proper housekeeping or zero) | 1 | | |
Disposed waste materials in the correct bin (Award 1 mark for proper waste disposal or zero) | 1 | | |
| Sub-Total | 2 | | |
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST |
Inspection checklist completed with all surface defects identified and measured (Award 7 marks for complete and accurate defect identification and measurement or zero) | 7 | | |
| Sub-Total | 7 | | |
| GRAND TOTAL | 20 | | |
ASSESSMENT OUTCOME: ☐ Competent ☐ Not Yet Competent (competent if at least 50%)
Practical 2: Destructive Testing of Casting Samples
Mechanical Production Technician · Level 6
Foundry Works
PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT
TIME: 4 HOURS
⬇ PDFCandidate Instructions (Candidate Tool)
Type: Individual
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATE:
1. You are required to perform the following task:
i. Conduct destructive testing on a grey cast iron casting sample 100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm to identify internal defects.
2. You have been provided with the following resources for the practical task:
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|
| Hand hammer 1 kg | Casting samples (grey cast iron) 100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm |
| Chisel 25 mm wide | |
| File set (flat and round) | |
| Vernier calipers 0-150 mm | |
| Microscope or magnifying glass (10x) | |
| Wire brush | |
| Marking chalk or pencil | |
⬇ PDFResources Required (Cutting List)
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|
| 1 | Casting samples (grey cast iron) 100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Hand hammer 1 kg | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Chisel 25 mm wide | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | File set (flat and round) | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 5 | Vernier calipers 0-150 mm | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Microscope or magnifying glass (10x) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Clear safety goggles | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 8 | Leather gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 9 | Dust coat/apron | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 10 | Wire brush | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 11 | Cotton waste | Enough per Candidate |
| 12 | Broom and dustpan | 1 Set per Workshop (shared) |
| 13 | Marking chalk or pencil | 1 Pc per Candidate |
⬇ PDFAssessor Guide
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|
| TASK 1: Safety and Preparation |
Wore PPEs: safety goggles, leather gloves, dust coat (Award 1 mark for each PPE worn or zero) | 3 | | |
Prepared operation plan for destructive testing as per procedure (Award 1 mark each for plan clarity, tool selection, safety considerations, and test steps) | 4 | | |
Selected and checked tools for suitability and safety (Award 2 marks for correct and safe tool selection or zero) | 2 | | |
| Sub-Total | 9 | | |
| TASK 2: Conducting Destructive Testing |
Marked casting sample for test locations correctly (Award 2 marks for correct marking or zero) | 2 | | |
Used hand hammer and chisel to carefully break the casting sample (Award 4 marks for correct technique and safety or zero) | 4 | | |
Observed and documented fracture surface and internal defects (Award 4 marks for detailed and accurate observation or zero) | 4 | | |
Measured dimensions of fracture and defect sizes using vernier calipers (Award 3 marks for accurate measurement or zero) | 3 | | |
| Sub-Total | 13 | | |
| TASK 3: Finishing and Housekeeping |
Cleaned tools and work area after testing (Award 1 mark each for cleaning tools and clearing area) | 2 | | |
Returned tools and accessories to designated storage (Award 1 mark for proper storage) | 1 | | |
Disposed waste and broken casting pieces in correct bin (Award 1 mark for correct waste disposal) | 1 | | |
| Sub-Total | 4 | | |
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST |
Identification and description of internal defects (e.g. porosity, cracks, inclusions) (Award 6 marks for correct identification and description or zero) | 6 | | |
Accuracy of fracture measurements (within ±0.5 mm tolerance) (Award 4 marks for all measurements within tolerance or zero) | 4 | | |
Quality of test report and observations recorded (Award 4 marks for completeness and clarity or zero) | 4 | | |
| Sub-Total | 14 | | |
| GRAND TOTAL | 40 | | |
ASSESSMENT OUTCOME: ☐ Competent ☐ Not Yet Competent (competent if at least 50%)
🔒Non-Destructive Testing of Castings for Internal and Surface DefectsPractical 3
🔒Identification of Porosity and Shrinkage Defects in CastingsPractical 4
🔒Detection of Warping and Sinks in CastingsPractical 5
🔒Identification of Slag Inclusions and Dross in CastingsPractical 6
🔒Inspection and Documentation of Hot Tears and Cold Shuts in CastingsPractical 7
🔒Perform annealing heat treatment on a cast iron samplePractical 8
🔒Perform Normalizing Heat Treatment on a Cast Iron CastingPractical 9
🔒Perform Quenching and Tempering on a Cast Steel PlatePractical 10
🔒Perform Case Hardening and Stress Relieving on a Mild Steel CastingPractical 11
🔒Trimming and Fettling of CastingsPractical 12
🔒Machining and Grinding of Castings to Specified DimensionsPractical 13
🔒Shot blasting of castings to clean and prepare surfacesPractical 14
🔒Preparation of Casting Inspection ReportPractical 15