By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Mastering this skill ensures your civil engineering projects start on a solid foundation, leading to safe and reliable structures in the real world.
Compiled by: Faith Achieng
Civil engineering projects rely heavily on strong, stable foundations to support structures safely and durably. The substructure, particularly foundations, transfers loads from the superstructure to the ground, ensuring stability and preventing settlement or failure. In Kenya, where soil conditions vary widely from Nairobi’s volcanic soils to Mombasa’s sandy coastal deposits, selecting the appropriate foundation type is critical to project success. This chapter explores common foundation types used in civil engineering works, focusing on their design principles, applications, and suitability in various ground conditions.
Foundations are engineered to distribute structural loads safely to the earth. The choice of foundation type depends on soil bearing capacity, load magnitude, water table level, and construction budget. In Kenya, engineers often encounter different foundation challenges, from expansive clay soils in Kisumu to firm rock in Nakuru, requiring careful foundation selection to ensure longevity of buildings and infrastructure.
Strip footing is a continuous strip of concrete that supports load-bearing walls and transfers structural loads along the length of the foundation. It is one of the most commonly used foundation types for low to medium-rise buildings in Kenya due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
A strip foundation plan and cross-section for a building substructure (Source: measurement of building works Demystified)
Strip footing must be designed to spread the load over a wide enough area to prevent soil failure. The width of the footing is determined by dividing the total load on the wall by the allowable soil bearing capacity. For example, a school building in Eldoret with moderate soil bearing capacity requires a wider strip footing than a similar structure on firm soils in Nairobi.
Constructing strip footing involves several critical steps to ensure stability and durability:
This method is widely used in residential housing developments across Kenya’s urban and peri-urban areas.
Strip footings are ideal for soils with good bearing capacity such as firm clay, gravel, or compacted sand. They are less suitable for loose, soft, or expansive soils which may cause uneven settlement. For instance, in parts of Thika where expansive black cotton soils are prevalent, alternative foundation types may be preferred to avoid structural damage.
Strip footing offers several benefits including ease of construction, lower cost, and suitability for continuous load-bearing walls. However, limitations include vulnerability to differential settlement in weak soils and unsuitability for heavy concentrated loads or tall structures. In commercial buildings in Kisumu, engineers sometimes avoid strip footings due to the high water table and soft soils.
Pad footings are isolated square or rectangular concrete pads that support individual columns. They are commonly used where column loads are large and ground conditions are favorable, providing concentrated support to disperse loads over a wider soil area.
The size of a pad footing depends on the column load and soil bearing capacity. The footing must be large enough to prevent soil pressure from exceeding allowable limits. For example, a bank branch in Nakuru with heavy reinforced concrete columns requires carefully calculated pad footing dimensions to ensure stability.
The construction of pad footings involves:
Pad footings are frequently used in multi-storey buildings in Nairobi’s central business district where columns carry significant loads.
Pad footings perform well on soils with adequate bearing capacity such as compacted sands or gravels. They are not recommended for highly compressible or expansive soils without additional ground improvement. At a county government office in Kisii, soil investigations revealed soft soils requiring soil stabilization before pad footings could be constructed.
Pad footings offer the advantage of supporting heavy point loads with minimal excavation and material use. They allow for flexibility in column placement and are relatively straightforward to build. Challenges include the risk of differential settlement if soil conditions vary beneath adjacent pads and the need for precise load calculations.
Raft foundations, also known as mat foundations, consist of a large concrete slab supporting several columns and walls, spreading the load across the entire building footprint. They are particularly useful in areas with poor soil conditions where individual footings might fail.
Raft foundations are designed to distribute heavy loads over a large area, minimizing differential settlement. They are commonly used in commercial buildings, hospitals, and other large structures in Nairobi’s soft soil zones. For instance, a university library constructed in a low-bearing capacity area employed a raft foundation to provide uniform support.
Design of raft foundations involves assessing soil bearing capacity, load distribution, and potential for soil movement. The slab thickness and reinforcement are calculated to resist bending moments and shear forces. Engineers must also consider water table levels, especially in coastal areas like Mombasa where groundwater can affect foundation performance.
Construction of raft foundations requires:
Large institutional projects such as county hospitals in Kisumu often use raft foundations due to the combination of heavy loads and variable soils.
Raft foundations reduce differential settlement by spreading loads evenly and are effective for weak or expansive soils. They can also reduce excavation costs compared to deep foundations. However, they require significant concrete and reinforcement, increasing initial costs and construction time, which may not be feasible for small residential projects.
Explain how soil bearing capacity influences the choice between strip footing and pad footing in civil engineering projects. (10 marks)
Describe the construction steps for a raft foundation and explain why continuous concrete pouring is essential. (12 marks)
Discuss the advantages and limitations of strip footing in the context of building construction in Kenya. (8 marks)
A column load of 150 kN is to be supported on a pad footing. If the allowable soil bearing capacity is 200 kN/m², calculate the required area of the footing. (5 marks)
Identify the factors that make raft foundations suitable for use in hospital buildings located on soft soils. (5 marks)
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter has explored the essential aspects of executing substructure works in civil engineering. It began by examining the main types of foundations including strip footing, pad footing, and raft, highlighting their distinct characteristics and applications. The process of setting out was then detailed, emphasizing the importance of understanding project requirements, preparing the site, using appropriate surveying equipment, and accurately marking the layout to ensure correct alignment and levels. Excavation of the foundation was discussed with attention to setting out the excavation area, controlling depth and width, maintaining slope stability, managing excavated material, and addressing groundwater challenges. The chapter further covered laying the foundation, focusing on selecting the foundation type, proper placement of reinforcement, and careful concrete pouring to achieve structural integrity. Finally, key structural elements such as columns, beams, staircases, and slabs were described, underscoring their roles in supporting and distributing loads within the building framework. Together, these topics provide a comprehensive understanding of the critical steps involved in substructure construction.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Tape measure | Soil test report (site specific) |
| Plumb bob | Foundation types reference chart |
| Builders square | Field notebook |
| Writing pen | |
| Calculator |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tape measure | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Plumb bob | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Builders square | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Soil test report (site specific) | 1 per Candidate |
| 5 | Foundation types reference chart | 1 per Candidate |
| 6 | Writing pen | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 7 | Field notebook | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Calculator | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Foundation Type Identification and Selection | |||
| Wore appropriate PPE (overall, safety boots, helmet) (Award 3 marks if all PPEs worn correctly; zero otherwise) | 3 | ||
| Interpreted soil test report accurately (Award 5 marks for correct interpretation; zero otherwise) | 5 | ||
| Measured and recorded site dimensions (12000mm x 9000mm) using tape measure (Award 2 marks for each dimension measured within ±10mm; zero otherwise) | 4 | ||
| Referred to foundation types chart to identify possible foundation types (Award 4 marks for correct identification of at least three relevant foundation types; zero otherwise) | 4 | ||
| Selected the most suitable foundation type(s) based on soil conditions and site data (Award 6 marks for correct and justified selection; zero otherwise) | 6 | ||
| Recorded findings and rationale clearly in field notebook (Award 3 marks for clear, legible, and complete recording; zero otherwise) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 25 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Correct identification of foundation types (e.g. strip, raft, pad, pile) (Award 5 marks for correct types matching soil conditions) | 5 | ||
| Accurate selection of foundation type(s) with justification based on soil bearing capacity and site conditions (Award 10 marks for justified selection consistent with site data) | 10 | ||
| Accurate recording of site dimensions (12000mm x 9000mm) with ±10mm tolerance (Award 5 marks for correct dimensions in documentation) | 5 | ||
| Clarity and completeness of final report in field notebook (Award 5 marks for well-organized, clear, and complete report) | 5 | ||
| Sub-Total | 25 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 50 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Tape measure | |
| Builders line | |
| Pegs | |
| Spirit level | |
| Plumb bob | |
| Builders square | |
| Slasher / panga | |
| Jembe | |
| Chalk or marking lime |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tape measure | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Builders line | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Pegs | 12 Pcs per Candidate |
| 4 | Spirit level | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Plumb bob | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Builders square | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Slasher / panga | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 8 | Jembe | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Chalk or marking lime | Sufficient per Candidate |
| 10 | Safety boots | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 11 | Overall | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 12 | Helmet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Site Preparation and Safety | |||
| Candidate wore PPE (overall, safety boots, helmet) (Award 3 marks if all PPE worn correctly or zero) | 3 | ||
| Cleared the ground surface of vegetation and debris (Award 3 marks if site cleared properly or zero) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 6 | ||
| TASK 2: Setting Out the Strip Footing Layout | |||
| Established baseline and set pegs at correct positions (Award 4 marks for correct baseline and pegs or zero) | 4 | ||
| Measured and marked length of 3000mm accurately (Award 3 marks for ±2mm accuracy or zero) | 3 | ||
| Measured and marked width of 600mm accurately (Award 3 marks for ±2mm accuracy or zero) | 3 | ||
| Checked and ensured right angles with builders square (Award 3 marks for 90° angles ±2° or zero) | 3 | ||
| Used builders line to mark straight and aligned edges (Award 3 marks for straight lines or zero) | 3 | ||
| Marked the depth of 450mm with pegs and lime (Award 2 marks for correct depth marking or zero) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 18 | ||
| TASK 3: Verification and Documentation | |||
| Verified measurements and levels using spirit level and plumb bob (Award 4 marks for accurate verification or zero) | 4 | ||
| Recorded layout dimensions and levels correctly (Award 4 marks for complete and accurate records or zero) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 8 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Strip footing layout length is 3000mm ±5mm (Award 4 marks for correct length or zero) | 4 | ||
| Strip footing layout width is 600mm ±5mm (Award 4 marks for correct width or zero) | 4 | ||
| Strip footing layout depth marked at 450mm ±5mm (Award 3 marks for correct depth or zero) | 3 | ||
| Layout is square with 90° corners ±2° (Award 3 marks for correct squareness or zero) | 3 | ||
| Lines are straight and properly aligned (Award 3 marks for straightness and alignment or zero) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 17 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 49 | ||
At the start of this chapter we promised you would be able to:
Tick each one you can genuinely do.
So, are you there yet?
You're competent when you can confidently do 50% or more of what this chapter promised.
Sign in to record how you're doing.