Compiled by: Kevin Rotich
Science laboratory research depends heavily on accurate and systematic data collection to ensure valid and reliable results. Laboratory technologists in Kenya engage in diverse research activities that require selecting appropriate data collection methods tailored to the study objectives and context. This chapter concentrates on three fundamental data collection techniques: interviews, surveys, and observations, each with distinct roles in gathering qualitative and quantitative information. Understanding these methods equips science laboratory professionals to enhance the quality of their research outcomes in hospitals, universities, and other research-intensive institutions.
Interviews are a direct method of collecting detailed information by engaging participants in a structured or semi-structured conversation. In laboratory research, interviews can clarify complex phenomena, capture expert knowledge, or collect subjective perspectives that are not easily quantifiable. This subtopic explores the nature of interviews, their types, preparation, and best practices to maximize data quality.
Interviews involve verbal interaction between the researcher and respondent to obtain in-depth information relevant to the research question. They enable probing beyond superficial answers to uncover motivations, attitudes, and experiences. In Kenyan medical research, for instance, interviewing laboratory technicians about challenges in sample handling can reveal operational gaps not evident through quantitative data.
There are several interview formats, each suited to different research needs:
Effective interviews require meticulous preparation:
Successful interviews depend on rapport and accurate data capture:
Surveys are quantitative or qualitative tools designed to collect standardized data from a population or sample. They are widely used in laboratory research to gather measurable information, such as prevalence rates or knowledge levels, often through questionnaires. This section dissects the design, administration, and analysis of surveys in the Kenyan science research setting.
Surveys provide a systematic method for collecting data that is:
Designing a survey involves careful crafting of questions and structure:
Accurate representation depends on appropriate sampling:
Efficient administration maximizes response rates and data quality:
Observation is a non-intrusive method where the researcher records behaviours, events, or conditions as they occur naturally. In laboratory research, observation can monitor procedural adherence, environmental conditions, or equipment usage without relying on participant self-reporting. This subtopic discusses observation types, planning, execution, and recording strategies.
Observations vary by structure and researcher involvement:
Effective observation requires detailed planning:
The execution phase demands attentiveness and discretion:
Post-observation activities ensure data usefulness:
Explain the differences between structured and unstructured interviews and provide examples of when each would be appropriate in a science laboratory research context. (10 marks)
Describe five types of survey questions and discuss how each type can impact data quality in laboratory research. (10 marks)
Outline six steps involved in planning and conducting an observation study in a hospital laboratory. (12 marks)
Create a free account to open more of this chapter.
Free: practical guides, quick cards, workplace scenarios and more.
Create a free accountThis chapter explored various data collection methods essential for science laboratory research, including interviews, surveys, and observations, highlighting their application in gathering reliable information. It examined the role of experiments in generating primary data and the importance of utilizing secondary data sources to complement research findings. Direct measurements were discussed as a precise means of obtaining quantitative data in laboratory settings. The chapter then addressed data organization, focusing on formatting, cleaning, and coding processes that prepare raw data for analysis. Different data analysis methods were outlined to interpret and derive meaningful conclusions from the collected data. Guidance on compiling a comprehensive research report was provided, covering the presentation of results, discussion of findings, drawing conclusions, making recommendations, and properly citing references and appendices. Finally, the chapter emphasized the proper submission of the research report as the concluding step in the research process.
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Spectrophotometer | Lab coat |
| Digital thermometer | Closed shoes |
| Stopwatch | Safety gloves |
| Scientific calculator | Data recording sheet |
| Beaker (100ml) | Enzyme solution |
| Cuvettes | Substrate solution |
| Writing materials | Distilled water |
| Answer booklet |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lab coat | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 2 | Closed shoes | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 3 | Safety gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 4 | Spectrophotometer | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Digital thermometer | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 6 | Stopwatch | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Data recording sheet | 2 Sheets per Candidate |
| 8 | Writing materials | 1 Set per Candidate |
| 9 | Scientific calculator | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 10 | Enzyme solution | 50ml per Candidate |
| 11 | Substrate solution | 50ml per Candidate |
| 12 | Distilled water | 100ml per Candidate |
| 13 | Beaker (100ml) | 2 Pcs per Candidate |
| 14 | Cuvettes | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 15 | Answer booklet | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Selection of Data Collection Methods | |||
| Donned PPEs as per laboratory safety standards (lab coat, closed shoes, safety gloves) (Award 1 mark for each PPE donned correctly as per workplace procedure x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Reviewed laboratory research scenario and identified key variables (enzyme activity, temperature) (Award 2 marks or zero for correctly identifying both variables) | 2 | ||
| Listed at least two potential data collection methods (e.g., quantitative measurement via spectrophotometer, observation, manual recording) (Award 1 mark per method listed x 2 = 2 Marks) | 2 | ||
| Selected the most suitable data collection method for the scenario (quantitative measurement using spectrophotometer) (Award 3 marks or zero for correct selection and description of method) | 3 | ||
| Justified the selected method with reference to accuracy, reliability, and suitability for laboratory research (Award 2 marks for accuracy/reliability justification and 2 marks for suitability to laboratory research = 4 Marks) | 4 | ||
| Outlined steps for implementing the chosen method including sample preparation, measurement, and recording (Award 1 mark for each step outlined: sample preparation, measurement, recording, and data management x 4 = 4 Marks) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 18 | ||
| TASK 2: Documentation of Data Collection Plan | |||
| Designed a data recording sheet with columns for temperature, enzyme activity readings, and time (Award 1 mark for each correctly labelled column x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Included clear instructions for data entry and handling (Award 2 marks or zero for clear, concise instructions) | 2 | ||
| Ensured data collection plan allows for replication and minimizes error (Award 3 marks or zero for inclusion of error minimization and replication steps) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 8 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Data collection plan is comprehensive, clearly structured, and addresses the research scenario (Award 6 marks or zero if plan is comprehensive and addresses scenario) | 6 | ||
| Data recording sheet is accurately formatted and suitable for capturing all required data (Award 4 marks or zero for correct formatting and suitability) | 4 | ||
| Sub-Total | 10 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 36 | ||
Type: Individual
| Tools & Equipment | Materials |
|---|---|
| Clip board | Interview questionnaire forms |
| Pen | Consent forms |
| Recording device | Lab coat |
| Laboratory technician roster | Closed shoes |
| Face mask | |
| Hand gloves | |
| Working laboratory environment |
| S/N | Item | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Interview questionnaire forms (A4) | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 2 | Clip board | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 3 | Pen | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 4 | Lab coat | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 5 | Closed shoes | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 6 | Face mask | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 7 | Hand gloves | 1 Pair per Candidate |
| 8 | Recording device (digital voice recorder or smartphone) | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 9 | Consent forms | 3 Pcs per Candidate |
| 10 | Laboratory technician roster | 1 Pc per Candidate |
| 11 | Working laboratory environment | Access per Candidate |
| Items to be Evaluated | Marks Available | Marks Obtained | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK 1: Preparation for Scientific Interviews | |||
| Donned PPEs: lab coat, closed shoes, face mask, gloves (Award 1 mark for each correctly donned PPE as per workplace procedure x 4 = 4 Marks) | 4 | ||
| Prepared and assembled all required materials (questionnaire forms, consent forms, clipboard, pen, recording device) (Award 1 mark for each item correctly assembled x 5 = 5 Marks) | 5 | ||
| Identified and scheduled interviews with three laboratory technicians using the roster (Award 1 mark for each technician correctly identified and scheduled x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 12 | ||
| TASK 2: Conducting Structured Interviews | |||
| Obtained written consent from each technician before interview (Award 1 mark for each consent form duly signed x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Asked all questions in the prepared questionnaire to each technician (Award 1 mark for each interview where all questions were asked x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Recorded responses verbatim using both written notes and recording device (Award 1 mark for each interview with responses accurately recorded x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Maintained professional conduct and confidentiality during interviews (Award 2 marks for demonstrating professional conduct and confidentiality throughout all interviews or zero) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 11 | ||
| TASK 3: Post-Interview Data Handling and Housekeeping | |||
| Ensured all completed questionnaire forms are properly labelled and organized (Award 1 mark for each questionnaire correctly labelled and filed x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Stored recorded audio files securely and documented file locations (Award 2 marks for correctly storing and documenting audio files or zero) | 2 | ||
| Disposed of used gloves and wiped down interview area as per laboratory hygiene procedures (Award 2 marks for proper disposal and cleaning or zero) | 2 | ||
| Sub-Total | 7 | ||
| PRODUCT CHECKLIST | |||
| Three completed questionnaire forms with all questions answered, labelled with technician names and interview dates (Award 2 marks per form for completeness, correct labelling, and legibility x 3 = 6 Marks) | 6 | ||
| Verbatim audio recordings of all three interviews stored and documented (Award 1 mark per correctly documented recording x 3 = 3 Marks) | 3 | ||
| Summary sheet listing key findings from the interviews (minimum 5 data points) (Award 3 marks for a summary sheet with at least 5 distinct, relevant data points or zero) | 3 | ||
| Sub-Total | 12 | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 42 | ||